From 8f6d9a8e6899d5e47fa97a7e80e4232e83ce94c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dimitry Andric Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 20:09:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Merge commit 41449c58c from llvm git (by Roger Ferrer Ibanez): [RISCV] Fix evaluation of %pcrel_lo The following testcase function: .Lpcrel_label1: auipc a0, %pcrel_hi(other_function) addi a1, a0, %pcrel_lo(.Lpcrel_label1) .p2align 2 # Causes a new fragment to be emitted .type other_function,@function other_function: ret exposes an odd behaviour in which only the %pcrel_hi relocation is evaluated but not the %pcrel_lo. $ llvm-mc -triple riscv64 -filetype obj t.s | llvm-objdump -d -r - : file format ELF64-riscv Disassembly of section .text: 0000000000000000 function: 0: 17 05 00 00 auipc a0, 0 4: 93 05 05 00 mv a1, a0 0000000000000004: R_RISCV_PCREL_LO12_I other_function+4 0000000000000008 other_function: 8: 67 80 00 00 ret The reason seems to be that in RISCVAsmBackend::shouldForceRelocation we only consider the fragment but in RISCVMCExpr::evaluatePCRelLo we consider the section. This usually works but there are cases where the section may still be the same but the fragment may be another one. In that case we end forcing a %pcrel_lo relocation without any %pcrel_hi. This patch makes RISCVAsmBackend::shouldForceRelocation use the section, if any, to determine if the relocation must be forced or not. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60657 This is a prerequisite for building and linking hard- and soft-float riscv worlds with clang and lld. Requested by: jhb MFC after: 1 week X-MFC-With: r353358 --- .../lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp b/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp index 61c5845cc175..969e0d6cec21 100644 --- a/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp +++ b/contrib/llvm-project/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/MCTargetDesc/RISCVAsmBackend.cpp @@ -64,11 +64,15 @@ bool RISCVAsmBackend::shouldForceRelocation(const MCAssembler &Asm, case RISCV::fixup_riscv_tls_gd_hi20: ShouldForce = true; break; - case RISCV::fixup_riscv_pcrel_hi20: - ShouldForce = T->getValue()->findAssociatedFragment() != - Fixup.getValue()->findAssociatedFragment(); + case RISCV::fixup_riscv_pcrel_hi20: { + MCFragment *TFragment = T->getValue()->findAssociatedFragment(); + MCFragment *FixupFragment = Fixup.getValue()->findAssociatedFragment(); + assert(FixupFragment && "We should have a fragment for this fixup"); + ShouldForce = + !TFragment || TFragment->getParent() != FixupFragment->getParent(); break; } + } break; }