Correct a locking error in apause: It should always hold
the simple lock when it returns. Also, eliminate spinning on a uniprocessor. It's pointless. Submitted by: bde, Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c38fb0340
commit
99c9d3490b
@ -103,23 +103,25 @@ shareunlock(struct lock *lkp, int decr) {
|
||||
* optimization troubles.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int
|
||||
apause(struct lock *lkp, int flags) {
|
||||
int lock_wait;
|
||||
lock_wait = LOCK_WAIT_TIME;
|
||||
for (; lock_wait > 0; lock_wait--) {
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
apause(struct lock *lkp, int flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef SMP
|
||||
int i, lock_wait;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if ((lkp->lk_flags & flags) == 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
#ifdef SMP
|
||||
for (lock_wait = LOCK_WAIT_TIME; lock_wait > 0; lock_wait--) {
|
||||
simple_unlock(&lkp->lk_interlock);
|
||||
for (i = LOCK_SAMPLE_WAIT; i > 0; i--)
|
||||
if ((lkp->lk_flags & flags) == 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
simple_lock(&lkp->lk_interlock);
|
||||
if ((lkp->lk_flags & flags) == 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
simple_unlock(&lkp->lk_interlock);
|
||||
for (i = LOCK_SAMPLE_WAIT; i > 0; i--) {
|
||||
if ((lkp->lk_flags & flags) == 0) {
|
||||
simple_lock(&lkp->lk_interlock);
|
||||
if ((lkp->lk_flags & flags) == 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user