Comment some flawed assumptions in inp_join_group() about
mixing SSM full-state and delta-based APIs. ENOTIME to fix right now. No functional changes. MFC after: 5 days
This commit is contained in:
parent
ebe8706174
commit
9dcdfc8226
@ -1857,6 +1857,7 @@ inp_join_group(struct inpcb *inp, struct sockopt *sopt)
|
||||
|
||||
ifp = NULL;
|
||||
imf = NULL;
|
||||
lims = NULL;
|
||||
error = 0;
|
||||
is_new = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1974,9 +1975,25 @@ inp_join_group(struct inpcb *inp, struct sockopt *sopt)
|
||||
error = EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out_inp_locked;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Throw out duplicates. */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Throw out duplicates.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX FIXME: This makes a naive assumption that
|
||||
* even if entries exist for *ssa in this imf,
|
||||
* they will be rejected as dupes, even if they
|
||||
* are not valid in the current mode (in-mode).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* in_msource is transactioned just as for anything
|
||||
* else in SSM -- but note naive use of inm_graft()
|
||||
* below for allocating new filter entries.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is only an issue if someone mixes the
|
||||
* full-state SSM API with the delta-based API,
|
||||
* which is discouraged in the relevant RFCs.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lims = imo_match_source(imo, idx, &ssa->sa);
|
||||
if (lims != NULL) {
|
||||
if (lims != NULL /*&&
|
||||
lims->imsl_st[1] == MCAST_INCLUDE*/) {
|
||||
error = EADDRNOTAVAIL;
|
||||
goto out_inp_locked;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2031,6 +2048,8 @@ inp_join_group(struct inpcb *inp, struct sockopt *sopt)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: Grafting of exclusive mode filters doesn't happen
|
||||
* in this path.
|
||||
* XXX: Should check for non-NULL lims (node exists but may
|
||||
* not be in-mode) for interop with full-state API.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ssa->ss.ss_family != AF_UNSPEC) {
|
||||
/* Membership starts in IN mode */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user