d/freebsd-skq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

We can't mask out the higher order bits and have the size come out

Browse Source 
right...  Good thing the size was ignored...

Where this macro is used, there's no reason to do it anyway.  There
seems to have been some old-time confusion between the CIS pointer
definition, and the BAR definitions at the base of this bug.
This commit is contained in:
imp 2008-11-03 05:52:43 +00:00
parent 49efee1c21
commit ab0c44b3d8
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
sys/dev/cardbus/cardbusreg.h
View File

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
#define CARDBUS_EXROM_DATA_CODE_TYPE 0x14 /* Code Type */
#define CARDBUS_EXROM_DATA_INDICATOR 0x15 /* Indicator */
#define CARDBUS_MAPREG_MEM_ADDR_MASK 0x0ffffff0
#define CARDBUS_MAPREG_MEM_ADDR_MASK 0xfffffff0
#define CARDBUS_MAPREG_MEM_ADDR(mr) \
((mr) & CARDBUS_MAPREG_MEM_ADDR_MASK)
#define CARDBUS_MAPREG_MEM_SIZE(mr) \