GCC: Add a new option "-fstack-protector-strong"

This includes additional functions to be protected: those that
have local array definitions, or have references to local frame
addresses. This is a new option in GCC-4.9 that was relicensed
by Han Shen from Google under GPLv2 for OpenBSD.

Obtained from:	OpenBSD (2014-01-14)
MFC after:	2 weeks

contrib/gcc/c-cppbuiltin.c

@@ -553,7 +553,9 @@ c_cpp_builtins (cpp_reader *pfile)
   /* Make the choice of the stack protector runtime visible to source code.
      The macro names and values here were chosen for compatibility with an
      earlier implementation, i.e. ProPolice.  */
-  if (flag_stack_protect == 2)
+  if (flag_stack_protect == 3)
+    cpp_define (pfile, "__SSP_STRONG__=3");
+  else if (flag_stack_protect == 2)
     cpp_define (pfile, "__SSP_ALL__=2");
   else if (flag_stack_protect == 1)
     cpp_define (pfile, "__SSP__=1");

contrib/gcc/cfgexpand.c

@@ -810,6 +810,12 @@ clear_tree_used (tree block)
     clear_tree_used (t);
 }
 
+enum {
+  SPCT_FLAG_DEFAULT = 1,
+  SPCT_FLAG_ALL = 2,
+  SPCT_FLAG_STRONG = 3
+};
+
 /* Examine TYPE and determine a bit mask of the following features.  */
 
 #define SPCT_HAS_LARGE_CHAR_ARRAY	1
@@ -879,7 +885,8 @@ stack_protect_decl_phase (tree decl)
   if (bits & SPCT_HAS_SMALL_CHAR_ARRAY)
     has_short_buffer = true;
 
-  if (flag_stack_protect == 2)
+  if (flag_stack_protect == SPCT_FLAG_ALL
+      || flag_stack_protect == SPCT_FLAG_STRONG)
     {
       if ((bits & (SPCT_HAS_SMALL_CHAR_ARRAY | SPCT_HAS_LARGE_CHAR_ARRAY))
 	  && !(bits & SPCT_HAS_AGGREGATE))
@@ -947,12 +954,36 @@ create_stack_guard (void)
   cfun->stack_protect_guard = guard;
 }
 
+/* Helper routine to check if a record or union contains an array field. */
+
+static int
+record_or_union_type_has_array_p (tree tree_type)
+{
+  tree fields = TYPE_FIELDS (tree_type);
+  tree f;
+
+  for (f = fields; f; f = TREE_CHAIN (f))
+    if (TREE_CODE (f) == FIELD_DECL)
+      {
+	tree field_type = TREE_TYPE (f);
+	if ((TREE_CODE (field_type) == RECORD_TYPE
+	     || TREE_CODE (field_type) == UNION_TYPE
+	     || TREE_CODE (field_type) == QUAL_UNION_TYPE)
+	    && record_or_union_type_has_array_p (field_type))
+	  return 1;
+	if (TREE_CODE (field_type) == ARRAY_TYPE)
+	  return 1;
+      }
+  return 0;
+}
+
 /* Expand all variables used in the function.  */
 
 static void
 expand_used_vars (void)
 {
   tree t, outer_block = DECL_INITIAL (current_function_decl);
+  bool gen_stack_protect_signal = false;
 
   /* Compute the phase of the stack frame for this function.  */
   {
@@ -972,6 +1003,29 @@ expand_used_vars (void)
   has_protected_decls = false;
   has_short_buffer = false;
 
+  if (flag_stack_protect == SPCT_FLAG_STRONG)
+    for (t = cfun->unexpanded_var_list; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
+      {
+	tree var = TREE_VALUE (t);
+	if (!is_global_var (var))
+	  {
+	    tree var_type = TREE_TYPE (var);
+	    /* Examine local referenced variables that have their addresses
+	     * taken, contain an array, or are arrays. */
+	    if (TREE_CODE (var) == VAR_DECL
+		&& (TREE_CODE (var_type) == ARRAY_TYPE
+		    || TREE_ADDRESSABLE (var)
+		    || ((TREE_CODE (var_type) == RECORD_TYPE
+			 || TREE_CODE (var_type) == UNION_TYPE
+			 || TREE_CODE (var_type) == QUAL_UNION_TYPE)
+			&& record_or_union_type_has_array_p (var_type))))
+	      {
+		gen_stack_protect_signal = true;
+		break;
+	      }
+	  }
+      }
+
   /* At this point all variables on the unexpanded_var_list with TREE_USED
      set are not associated with any block scope.  Lay them out.  */
   for (t = cfun->unexpanded_var_list; t; t = TREE_CHAIN (t))
@@ -1032,12 +1086,26 @@ expand_used_vars (void)
 	dump_stack_var_partition ();
     }
 
-  /* There are several conditions under which we should create a
-     stack guard: protect-all, alloca used, protected decls present.  */
-  if (flag_stack_protect == 2
-      || (flag_stack_protect
-	  && (current_function_calls_alloca || has_protected_decls)))
+  switch (flag_stack_protect)
+    {
+    case SPCT_FLAG_ALL:
       create_stack_guard ();
+      break;
+
+    case SPCT_FLAG_STRONG:
+      if (gen_stack_protect_signal
+	  || current_function_calls_alloca || has_protected_decls)
+	create_stack_guard ();
+      break;
+
+    case SPCT_FLAG_DEFAULT:
+      if (current_function_calls_alloca || has_protected_decls)
+	create_stack_guard();
+      break;
+
+    default:
+      ;
+    }
 
   /* Assign rtl to each variable based on these partitions.  */
   if (stack_vars_num > 0)

contrib/gcc/common.opt

@@ -878,6 +878,10 @@ fstack-protector-all
 Common Report RejectNegative Var(flag_stack_protect, 2) VarExists
 Use a stack protection method for every function
 
+fstack-protector-strong
+Common Report RejectNegative Var(flag_stack_protect, 3)
+Use a smart stack protection method for certain functions
+
 fstrength-reduce
 Common
 Does nothing.  Preserved for backward compatibility.

contrib/gcc/doc/cpp.texi

@@ -2134,6 +2134,10 @@ use.
 This macro is defined, with value 2, when @option{-fstack-protector-all} is
 in use.
 
+@item __SSP_STRONG__
+This macro is defined, with value 3, when @option{-fstack-protector-strong} is
+in use.
+
 @item __TIMESTAMP__
 This macro expands to a string constant that describes the date and time
 of the last modification of the current source file. The string constant

contrib/gcc/doc/gcc.1

@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ in the following sections.
 \&\fB\-fsched2\-use\-superblocks 
 \&\-fsched2\-use\-traces \-fsee \-freschedule\-modulo\-scheduled\-loops 
 \&\-fsection\-anchors  \-fsignaling\-nans  \-fsingle\-precision\-constant 
-\&\-fstack\-protector  \-fstack\-protector\-all 
+\&\-fstack\-protector  \-fstack\-protector\-all   \-fstack\-protector\-strong
 \&\-fstrict\-aliasing  \-fstrict\-overflow  \-ftracer  \-fthread\-jumps 
 \&\-funroll\-all\-loops  \-funroll\-loops  \-fpeel\-loops 
 \&\-fsplit\-ivs\-in\-unroller \-funswitch\-loops 
@@ -5193,6 +5193,11 @@ If a guard check fails, an error message is printed and the program exits.
 .IP "\fB\-fstack\-protector\-all\fR" 4
 .IX Item "-fstack-protector-all"
 Like \fB\-fstack\-protector\fR except that all functions are protected.
+.IP "\fB\-fstack\-protector\-strong\fR" 4
+.IX Item "-fstack-protector-strong"
+Like \fB\-fstack\-protector\fR but includes additional functions to
+be protected \-\-\- those that have local array definitions, or have
+references to local frame addresses.
 .IP "\fB\-fsection\-anchors\fR" 4
 .IX Item "-fsection-anchors"
 Try to reduce the number of symbolic address calculations by using

contrib/gcc/doc/invoke.texi

@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ in the following sections.
 -fsched2-use-superblocks @gol
 -fsched2-use-traces -fsee -freschedule-modulo-scheduled-loops @gol
 -fsection-anchors  -fsignaling-nans  -fsingle-precision-constant @gol
--fstack-protector  -fstack-protector-all @gol
+-fstack-protector  -fstack-protector-all  -fstack-protector-strong @gol
 -fstrict-aliasing  -fstrict-overflow  -ftracer  -fthread-jumps @gol
 -funroll-all-loops  -funroll-loops  -fpeel-loops @gol
 -fsplit-ivs-in-unroller -funswitch-loops @gol
@@ -5810,6 +5810,11 @@ If a guard check fails, an error message is printed and the program exits.
 @item -fstack-protector-all
 Like @option{-fstack-protector} except that all functions are protected.
 
+@item -fstack-protector-strong
+Like @option{-fstack-protector} but includes additional functions to
+be protected --- those that have local array definitions, or have
+references to local frame addresses.
+
 @item -fsection-anchors
 @opindex fsection-anchors
 Try to reduce the number of symbolic address calculations by using

contrib/gcc/gcc.c

@@ -680,7 +680,7 @@ proper position among the other output files.  */
 #ifdef TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP
 #define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector:}"
 #else
-#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-all:-lssp_nonshared -lssp}"
+#define LINK_SSP_SPEC "%{fstack-protector|fstack-protector-strong|fstack-protector-all:-lssp_nonshared -lssp}"
 #endif
 #endif