From c2e7dba7f8c61ab15a9ee6acea90b5db22e5a182 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Somers Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 18:12:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fuse(4): add tests relating to open(2) flags Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation --- tests/sys/fs/fuse/open.cc | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/sys/fs/fuse/open.cc b/tests/sys/fs/fuse/open.cc index 003f78e18e67..4f750663a201 100644 --- a/tests/sys/fs/fuse/open.cc +++ b/tests/sys/fs/fuse/open.cc @@ -36,7 +36,58 @@ extern "C" { using namespace testing; -class Open: public FuseTest {}; +class Open: public FuseTest { + +public: + +/* Test an OK open of a file with the given flags */ +void test_ok(int os_flags, int fuse_flags) { + const char FULLPATH[] = "mountpoint/some_file.txt"; + const char RELPATH[] = "some_file.txt"; + uint64_t ino = 42; + int fd; + + EXPECT_LOOKUP(1, RELPATH).WillOnce(Invoke([=](auto in, auto out) { + out->header.unique = in->header.unique; + SET_OUT_HEADER_LEN(out, entry); + out->body.entry.attr.mode = S_IFREG | 0644; + out->body.entry.nodeid = ino; + out->body.entry.attr_valid = UINT64_MAX; + })); + + EXPECT_CALL(*m_mock, process( + ResultOf([=](auto in) { + return (in->header.opcode == FUSE_OPEN && + in->body.open.flags == (uint32_t)fuse_flags && + in->header.nodeid == ino); + }, Eq(true)), + _) + ).WillOnce(Invoke([](auto in, auto out) { + out->header.unique = in->header.unique; + out->header.len = sizeof(out->header); + SET_OUT_HEADER_LEN(out, open); + })); + + /* Until the attr cache is working, we may send an additional GETATTR */ + EXPECT_CALL(*m_mock, process( + ResultOf([=](auto in) { + return (in->header.opcode == FUSE_GETATTR && + in->header.nodeid == ino); + }, Eq(true)), + _) + ).WillRepeatedly(Invoke([=](auto in, auto out) { + out->header.unique = in->header.unique; + SET_OUT_HEADER_LEN(out, attr); + out->body.attr.attr.ino = ino; // Must match nodeid + out->body.attr.attr.mode = S_IFREG | 0644; + })); + + fd = open(FULLPATH, os_flags); + EXPECT_LE(0, fd) << strerror(errno); + /* Deliberately leak fd. close(2) will be tested in release.cc */ +} +}; + /* * The fuse daemon fails the request with enoent. This usually indicates a @@ -95,48 +146,60 @@ TEST_F(Open, eperm) EXPECT_EQ(EPERM, errno); } -TEST_F(Open, ok) +/* https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236340 */ +TEST_F(Open, DISABLED_o_append) { - const char FULLPATH[] = "mountpoint/some_file.txt"; - const char RELPATH[] = "some_file.txt"; - uint64_t ino = 42; - int fd; - - EXPECT_LOOKUP(1, RELPATH).WillOnce(Invoke([=](auto in, auto out) { - out->header.unique = in->header.unique; - SET_OUT_HEADER_LEN(out, entry); - out->body.entry.attr.mode = S_IFREG | 0644; - out->body.entry.nodeid = ino; - out->body.entry.attr_valid = UINT64_MAX; - })); - - EXPECT_CALL(*m_mock, process( - ResultOf([=](auto in) { - return (in->header.opcode == FUSE_OPEN && - in->header.nodeid == ino); - }, Eq(true)), - _) - ).WillOnce(Invoke([](auto in, auto out) { - out->header.unique = in->header.unique; - out->header.len = sizeof(out->header); - SET_OUT_HEADER_LEN(out, open); - })); - - /* Until the attr cache is working, we may send an additional GETATTR */ - EXPECT_CALL(*m_mock, process( - ResultOf([=](auto in) { - return (in->header.opcode == FUSE_GETATTR && - in->header.nodeid == ino); - }, Eq(true)), - _) - ).WillRepeatedly(Invoke([=](auto in, auto out) { - out->header.unique = in->header.unique; - SET_OUT_HEADER_LEN(out, attr); - out->body.attr.attr.ino = ino; // Must match nodeid - out->body.attr.attr.mode = S_IFREG | 0644; - })); - - fd = open(FULLPATH, O_RDONLY); - EXPECT_LE(0, fd) << strerror(errno); - /* Deliberately leak fd. close(2) will be tested in release.cc */ + test_ok(O_WRONLY | O_APPEND, O_WRONLY | O_APPEND); } + +/* The kernel is supposed to filter out this flag */ +TEST_F(Open, o_creat) +{ + test_ok(O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, O_WRONLY); +} + +/* https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236340 */ +TEST_F(Open, DISABLED_o_direct) +{ + test_ok(O_WRONLY | O_DIRECT, O_WRONLY | O_DIRECT); +} + +/* The kernel is supposed to filter out this flag */ +TEST_F(Open, o_excl) +{ + test_ok(O_WRONLY | O_EXCL, O_WRONLY); +} + +/* https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236329 */ +TEST_F(Open, DISABLED_o_exec) +{ + test_ok(O_EXEC, O_EXEC); +} + +/* The kernel is supposed to filter out this flag */ +TEST_F(Open, o_noctty) +{ + test_ok(O_WRONLY | O_NOCTTY, O_WRONLY); +} + +TEST_F(Open, o_rdonly) +{ + test_ok(O_RDONLY, O_RDONLY); +} + +/* https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236340 */ +TEST_F(Open, DISABLED_o_trunc) +{ + test_ok(O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC); +} + +TEST_F(Open, o_wronly) +{ + test_ok(O_WRONLY, O_WRONLY); +} + +TEST_F(Open, o_rdwr) +{ + test_ok(O_RDWR, O_RDWR); +} +