Make pass(4) handle misaligned buffers of MAXPHYS size.
Since we are already using malloc()+copyin()/copyout() for smaller data blocks, and since new asynchronous API does it always, I see no reason to keep this ugly artificial size/alignment limitation in old API. Tape applications suffer enough from the MAXPHYS limitations by itself, and additional alignment requirement, often halving effectively usable block size, does not help. It would be good to use unmapped I/O here instead, but it require some HBA drivers polishing first to support non-BIO unmapped buffers. MFC after: 2 weeks Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ab1cb52b2
commit
c389a786dd
@ -786,6 +786,7 @@ cam_periph_mapmem(union ccb *ccb, struct cam_periph_map_info *mapinfo,
|
||||
u_int8_t **data_ptrs[CAM_PERIPH_MAXMAPS];
|
||||
u_int32_t lengths[CAM_PERIPH_MAXMAPS];
|
||||
u_int32_t dirs[CAM_PERIPH_MAXMAPS];
|
||||
bool misaligned[CAM_PERIPH_MAXMAPS];
|
||||
|
||||
bzero(mapinfo, sizeof(*mapinfo));
|
||||
if (maxmap == 0)
|
||||
@ -897,6 +898,12 @@ cam_periph_mapmem(union ccb *ccb, struct cam_periph_map_info *mapinfo,
|
||||
* have to unmap any previously mapped buffers.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < numbufs; i++) {
|
||||
if (lengths[i] > maxmap) {
|
||||
printf("cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map %lu bytes, "
|
||||
"which is greater than %lu\n",
|
||||
(long)(lengths[i]), (u_long)maxmap);
|
||||
return (E2BIG);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The userland data pointer passed in may not be page
|
||||
@ -906,15 +913,8 @@ cam_periph_mapmem(union ccb *ccb, struct cam_periph_map_info *mapinfo,
|
||||
* whatever extra space is necessary to make it to the page
|
||||
* boundary.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((lengths[i] +
|
||||
(((vm_offset_t)(*data_ptrs[i])) & PAGE_MASK)) > maxmap){
|
||||
printf("cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map %lu bytes, "
|
||||
"which is greater than %lu\n",
|
||||
(long)(lengths[i] +
|
||||
(((vm_offset_t)(*data_ptrs[i])) & PAGE_MASK)),
|
||||
(u_long)maxmap);
|
||||
return(E2BIG);
|
||||
}
|
||||
misaligned[i] = (lengths[i] +
|
||||
(((vm_offset_t)(*data_ptrs[i])) & PAGE_MASK) > MAXPHYS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ cam_periph_mapmem(union ccb *ccb, struct cam_periph_map_info *mapinfo,
|
||||
* small allocations malloc is backed by UMA, and so much
|
||||
* cheaper on SMP systems.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (lengths[i] <= periph_mapmem_thresh &&
|
||||
if ((lengths[i] <= periph_mapmem_thresh || misaligned[i]) &&
|
||||
ccb->ccb_h.func_code != XPT_MMC_IO) {
|
||||
*data_ptrs[i] = malloc(lengths[i], M_CAMPERIPH,
|
||||
M_WAITOK);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user