Push UFS_ACL back for i386. We have 11kbytes of free space on kern.flp.
If we have no UFS_ACL kernel, users who already uses UFS1/2 attributes get confused since no access control is performed for an update install. Still, pc98 and alpha doesn't have UFS_ACL since I don't know about them. Nyan-san, if kern.flp on tatsu has enough spaces (4k or more spaces), please back UFS_ACL for pc98 also. Data collected from: 5.0-CURRENT-20030221-JPSNAP on snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
210114da25
commit
c6646c2f7d
@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ sed \
|
||||
-e '/PSEUDOFS/d' \
|
||||
-e '/SOFTUPDATES/d' \
|
||||
-e '/SYSV/d' \
|
||||
-e '/UFS_ACL/d' \
|
||||
-e '/UFS_DIRHASH/d' \
|
||||
-e '/WITNESS/d' \
|
||||
-e '/_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING/d' \
|
||||
|
@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ sed \
|
||||
-e '/PSEUDOFS/d' \
|
||||
-e '/SOFTUPDATES/d' \
|
||||
-e '/SYSV/d' \
|
||||
-e '/UFS_ACL/d' \
|
||||
-e '/UFS_DIRHASH/d' \
|
||||
-e '/WITNESS/d' \
|
||||
-e '/_KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING/d' \
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user