Change the `mutex_prof' structure to use three variables contained

in an anonymous structure as counters, instead of an array with
preprocessor-defined names for indices.  Remove the associated XXX-
comment.
This commit is contained in:
Robert Drehmel 2002-10-22 16:06:28 +00:00
parent 3e732e7d7d
commit d08926b1f6
2 changed files with 28 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@ -218,14 +218,11 @@ struct mutex_prof {
const char *name;
const char *file;
int line;
/*
* XXX should use specialized struct members instead of an array
* and these silly #defines.
*/
#define MPROF_MAX 0
#define MPROF_TOT 1
#define MPROF_CNT 2
uintmax_t counter[3];
struct {
uintmax_t max;
uintmax_t tot;
uintmax_t cur;
} cnt;
struct mutex_prof *next;
};
@ -297,12 +294,11 @@ dump_mutex_prof_stats(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
mtx_lock_spin(&mprof_mtx);
for (i = 0; i < first_free_mprof_buf; ++i)
sbuf_printf(sb, "%6ju %12ju %11ju %5ju %s:%d (%s)\n",
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_MAX] / 1000,
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_TOT] / 1000,
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_CNT],
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_CNT] == 0 ? (uintmax_t)0 :
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_TOT] /
(mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_CNT] * 1000),
mprof_buf[i].cnt.max / 1000,
mprof_buf[i].cnt.tot / 1000,
mprof_buf[i].cnt.cur,
mprof_buf[i].cnt.cur == 0 ? (uintmax_t)0 :
mprof_buf[i].cnt.tot / (mprof_buf[i].cnt.cur * 1000),
mprof_buf[i].file, mprof_buf[i].line, mprof_buf[i].name);
mtx_unlock_spin(&mprof_mtx);
sbuf_finish(sb);
@ -397,10 +393,10 @@ _mtx_unlock_flags(struct mtx *m, int opts, const char *file, int line)
* Record if the mutex has been held longer now than ever
* before.
*/
if (now - acqtime > mpp->counter[MPROF_MAX])
mpp->counter[MPROF_MAX] = now - acqtime;
mpp->counter[MPROF_TOT] += now - acqtime;
mpp->counter[MPROF_CNT]++;
if (now - acqtime > mpp->cnt.max)
mpp->cnt.max = now - acqtime;
mpp->cnt.tot += now - acqtime;
mpp->cnt.cur++;
unlock:
mtx_unlock_spin(&mprof_mtx);
}

View File

@ -218,14 +218,11 @@ struct mutex_prof {
const char *name;
const char *file;
int line;
/*
* XXX should use specialized struct members instead of an array
* and these silly #defines.
*/
#define MPROF_MAX 0
#define MPROF_TOT 1
#define MPROF_CNT 2
uintmax_t counter[3];
struct {
uintmax_t max;
uintmax_t tot;
uintmax_t cur;
} cnt;
struct mutex_prof *next;
};
@ -297,12 +294,11 @@ dump_mutex_prof_stats(SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS)
mtx_lock_spin(&mprof_mtx);
for (i = 0; i < first_free_mprof_buf; ++i)
sbuf_printf(sb, "%6ju %12ju %11ju %5ju %s:%d (%s)\n",
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_MAX] / 1000,
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_TOT] / 1000,
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_CNT],
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_CNT] == 0 ? (uintmax_t)0 :
mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_TOT] /
(mprof_buf[i].counter[MPROF_CNT] * 1000),
mprof_buf[i].cnt.max / 1000,
mprof_buf[i].cnt.tot / 1000,
mprof_buf[i].cnt.cur,
mprof_buf[i].cnt.cur == 0 ? (uintmax_t)0 :
mprof_buf[i].cnt.tot / (mprof_buf[i].cnt.cur * 1000),
mprof_buf[i].file, mprof_buf[i].line, mprof_buf[i].name);
mtx_unlock_spin(&mprof_mtx);
sbuf_finish(sb);
@ -397,10 +393,10 @@ _mtx_unlock_flags(struct mtx *m, int opts, const char *file, int line)
* Record if the mutex has been held longer now than ever
* before.
*/
if (now - acqtime > mpp->counter[MPROF_MAX])
mpp->counter[MPROF_MAX] = now - acqtime;
mpp->counter[MPROF_TOT] += now - acqtime;
mpp->counter[MPROF_CNT]++;
if (now - acqtime > mpp->cnt.max)
mpp->cnt.max = now - acqtime;
mpp->cnt.tot += now - acqtime;
mpp->cnt.cur++;
unlock:
mtx_unlock_spin(&mprof_mtx);
}