Be more careful how we restore interrupts. Don't rewrite most of the
PSR only to achieve setting PSR.i back to it's previous value. It makes it impossible to change any of the 30+ other unrelated bits when done between intr_disable() and intr_restore(). That's bad. Instead have intr_disable() return 1 when interrupts were previously enabled and 0 otherwise and only enable interrupts in intr_restore() when given a non-0 value. This change specifically disallows using intr_restore() to disable interrupts. The reason is simple: interrupts only need to be restored after they are being disabled, which means that intr_restore() is called with interrupts disabled and we only need to enable them if they were previously enabled. This change does not fix any bugs, other than that it bugged me... Approved by: re@ (blanket)
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b4ed28b3c
commit
d19c2253df
@ -193,13 +193,14 @@ intr_disable(void)
|
||||
register_t psr;
|
||||
__asm __volatile ("mov %0=psr;;" : "=r"(psr));
|
||||
disable_intr();
|
||||
return (psr);
|
||||
return ((psr & IA64_PSR_I) ? 1 : 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __inline void
|
||||
intr_restore(critical_t psr)
|
||||
intr_restore(register_t ie)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__asm __volatile ("mov psr.l=%0;; srlz.d" :: "r"(psr));
|
||||
if (ie)
|
||||
enable_intr();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _KERNEL */
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user