[net80211] put in a comment about the not-quite-correctness of A-MPDU parameters.
Although we correctly (now!) calculate the right A-MPDU parameters, the ioctl() has some faulty logic for choosing which to display. The BSS params are what were advertised to us, and we would have chosen the lower of theirs/ours when advertising the HT bits back at them. So, we /should/ track and fix that so we display the correct A-MPDU density and size. However, since I'm a forgetful type, and I don't want to have to re-learn that this is wrong, drop in a comment so I or someone else fixes it. Or, when I discover this again in 4 years, I don't have to go digging too much to remember.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5af0054863
commit
d6c7275477
@ -1020,6 +1020,10 @@ ieee80211_ioctl_get80211(struct ieee80211vap *vap, u_long cmd,
|
||||
if (vap->iv_opmode == IEEE80211_M_HOSTAP)
|
||||
ireq->i_val = vap->iv_ampdu_rxmax;
|
||||
else if (vap->iv_state == IEEE80211_S_RUN || vap->iv_state == IEEE80211_S_SLEEP)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* XXX TODO: this isn't completely correct, as we've
|
||||
* negotiated the higher of the two.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ireq->i_val = MS(vap->iv_bss->ni_htparam,
|
||||
IEEE80211_HTCAP_MAXRXAMPDU);
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -1028,6 +1032,10 @@ ieee80211_ioctl_get80211(struct ieee80211vap *vap, u_long cmd,
|
||||
case IEEE80211_IOC_AMPDU_DENSITY:
|
||||
if (vap->iv_opmode == IEEE80211_M_STA &&
|
||||
(vap->iv_state == IEEE80211_S_RUN || vap->iv_state == IEEE80211_S_SLEEP))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* XXX TODO: this isn't completely correct, as we've
|
||||
* negotiated the higher of the two.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ireq->i_val = MS(vap->iv_bss->ni_htparam,
|
||||
IEEE80211_HTCAP_MPDUDENSITY);
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user