d/freebsd-skq
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

When allocating 'struct acl' instances, use malloc(9) instead of uma(9).

Browse Source 
This struct will get much bigger soon, and we don't want to waste too much
memory on UMA caches.

Reviewed by:	rwatson
This commit is contained in:
Edward Tomasz Napierala 2009-04-19 09:56:30 +00:00
parent 019dfcf65e
commit e0ee758989
1 changed files with 3 additions and 15 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
sys/kern/vfs_acl.c
View File

@ -56,9 +56,8 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
#include <security/mac/mac_framework.h>
#include <vm/uma.h>
static MALLOC_DEFINE(M_ACL, "acl", "Access Control Lists");
uma_zone_t acl_zone;
static int vacl_set_acl(struct thread *td, struct vnode *vp,
acl_type_t type, struct acl *aclp);
static int vacl_get_acl(struct thread *td, struct vnode *vp,
@ -430,7 +429,7 @@ acl_alloc(int flags)
{
struct acl *aclp;
aclp = uma_zalloc(acl_zone, flags);
aclp = malloc(sizeof(*aclp), M_ACL, flags);
return (aclp);
}
@ -439,16 +438,5 @@ void
acl_free(struct acl *aclp)
{
uma_zfree(acl_zone, aclp);
free(aclp, M_ACL);
}
/* ARGUSED */
static void
aclinit(void *dummy __unused)
{
acl_zone = uma_zcreate("ACL UMA zone", sizeof(struct acl),
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, UMA_ALIGN_PTR, 0);
}
SYSINIT(acls, SI_SUB_ACL, SI_ORDER_FIRST, aclinit, NULL);