xen/netfront: don't drop the ring RX lock with inconsistent ring state
Make sure the RX ring lock is only released when the state of the ring is consistent, or else concurrent calls to xn_rxeof might get an inconsistent ring state and thus some packets might be processed twice. Note that this is not very common, and could only happen when an interrupt is delivered while in xn_ifinit. Reported by: cperciva Tested by: cperciva MFC after: 1 week Sponsored by: Citrix Systems R&D
This commit is contained in:
parent
d2baf237b6
commit
e1a49a5dcf
@ -1161,17 +1161,18 @@ xn_rxeof(struct netfront_rxq *rxq)
|
||||
struct mbufq mbufq_rxq, mbufq_errq;
|
||||
int err, work_to_do;
|
||||
|
||||
XN_RX_LOCK_ASSERT(rxq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!netfront_carrier_ok(np))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* XXX: there should be some sane limit. */
|
||||
mbufq_init(&mbufq_errq, INT_MAX);
|
||||
mbufq_init(&mbufq_rxq, INT_MAX);
|
||||
|
||||
ifp = np->xn_ifp;
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
XN_RX_LOCK_ASSERT(rxq);
|
||||
if (!netfront_carrier_ok(np))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* XXX: there should be some sane limit. */
|
||||
mbufq_init(&mbufq_errq, INT_MAX);
|
||||
mbufq_init(&mbufq_rxq, INT_MAX);
|
||||
|
||||
ifp = np->xn_ifp;
|
||||
|
||||
rp = rxq->ring.sring->rsp_prod;
|
||||
rmb(); /* Ensure we see queued responses up to 'rp'. */
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1191,7 +1192,7 @@ xn_rxeof(struct netfront_rxq *rxq)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
m->m_pkthdr.rcvif = ifp;
|
||||
if ( rx->flags & NETRXF_data_validated ) {
|
||||
if (rx->flags & NETRXF_data_validated) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* According to mbuf(9) the correct way to tell
|
||||
* the stack that the checksum of an inbound
|
||||
@ -1214,50 +1215,45 @@ xn_rxeof(struct netfront_rxq *rxq)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(void )mbufq_enqueue(&mbufq_rxq, m);
|
||||
rxq->ring.rsp_cons = i;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mbufq_drain(&mbufq_errq);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Process all the mbufs after the remapping is complete.
|
||||
* Break the mbuf chain first though.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while ((m = mbufq_dequeue(&mbufq_rxq)) != NULL) {
|
||||
if_inc_counter(ifp, IFCOUNTER_IPACKETS, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* XXX: Do we really need to drop the rx lock? */
|
||||
XN_RX_UNLOCK(rxq);
|
||||
#if (defined(INET) || defined(INET6))
|
||||
/* Use LRO if possible */
|
||||
if ((ifp->if_capenable & IFCAP_LRO) == 0 ||
|
||||
lro->lro_cnt == 0 || tcp_lro_rx(lro, m, 0)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If LRO fails, pass up to the stack
|
||||
* directly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
(*ifp->if_input)(ifp, m);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
(*ifp->if_input)(ifp, m);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
XN_RX_LOCK(rxq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rxq->ring.rsp_cons = i;
|
||||
|
||||
#if (defined(INET) || defined(INET6))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Flush any outstanding LRO work
|
||||
*/
|
||||
tcp_lro_flush_all(lro);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
xn_alloc_rx_buffers(rxq);
|
||||
|
||||
RING_FINAL_CHECK_FOR_RESPONSES(&rxq->ring, work_to_do);
|
||||
} while (work_to_do);
|
||||
|
||||
XN_RX_UNLOCK(rxq);
|
||||
mbufq_drain(&mbufq_errq);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Process all the mbufs after the remapping is complete.
|
||||
* Break the mbuf chain first though.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while ((m = mbufq_dequeue(&mbufq_rxq)) != NULL) {
|
||||
if_inc_counter(ifp, IFCOUNTER_IPACKETS, 1);
|
||||
#if (defined(INET) || defined(INET6))
|
||||
/* Use LRO if possible */
|
||||
if ((ifp->if_capenable & IFCAP_LRO) == 0 ||
|
||||
lro->lro_cnt == 0 || tcp_lro_rx(lro, m, 0)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If LRO fails, pass up to the stack
|
||||
* directly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
(*ifp->if_input)(ifp, m);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
(*ifp->if_input)(ifp, m);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#if (defined(INET) || defined(INET6))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Flush any outstanding LRO work
|
||||
*/
|
||||
tcp_lro_flush_all(lro);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
XN_RX_LOCK(rxq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user