Correct assertion to assert that the existing device VM object uses the
same type rather than asserting in the case where we just created a new VM object. Reviewed by: kib
This commit is contained in:
parent
22ac1edc7b
commit
ee403b8a8c
@ -169,18 +169,20 @@ cdev_pager_allocate(void *handle, enum obj_type tp, struct cdev_pager_ops *ops,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (pindex > object->size)
|
||||
object->size = pindex;
|
||||
KASSERT(object->type == tp,
|
||||
("Inconsistent device pager type %p %d", object, tp));
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
object = object1;
|
||||
object1 = NULL;
|
||||
object->handle = handle;
|
||||
TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&dev_pager_object_list, object,
|
||||
pager_object_list);
|
||||
KASSERT(object->type == tp,
|
||||
("Inconsistent device pager type %p %d", object, tp));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (pindex > object->size)
|
||||
object->size = pindex;
|
||||
KASSERT(object->type == tp,
|
||||
("Inconsistent device pager type %p %d", object, tp));
|
||||
}
|
||||
mtx_unlock(&dev_pager_mtx);
|
||||
if (object1 != NULL) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user