Fix placement of __bss_start in i386 kernel linker script
With lld 7.0.0, a rather nasty problem in our kernel linker script came to light. We use quite a lot of so-called "orphan" sections, e.g. sections which are not explicitly named in the linker script. Mainly, these are the linker sets (such as set_sysinit_set). Note that the placement of these orphan sections is not very well defined. Usually, any read-only orphan sections get placed after the last read-only section from the linker script, and similarly for the read/write variants. In our linker scripts, there are also symbol assignments like _etext, _edata, and __bss_start, which are used in various places to refer to the start or end addresses of sections. However, some of these symbol assignments are interspersed with output section descriptions. While the linker will guarantee that a symbol assignment after some section will stay after that section, there is no guarantee that an orphan section cannot be inserted just before it. Take for example the following script: SECTIONS { .data : { *(.data) } __bss_start = .; .bss : { *(.bss) } } If an orphan section (like set_sysinit_set) is now inserted just after the __bss_start assignment, __bss_start will actually point to the start of that orphan section, *not* to the start of the .bss section. Unfortunately, something like this happened with our i386 kernel linker script, and since sys/i386/i386/locore.s tries to zero .bss, it ended up zeroing all the linker sets too, leading to a crash very soon after the <--BOOT--> message. To fix this, move the __bss_start symbol assignment *into* the .bss section description, so there is no way a linker can then insert orphan sections at that point. Also add a corresponding __bss_end symbol. In addition, change sys/i386/i386/locore.s, so it clears from __bss_start to __bss_end, instead of assuming that _edata is just before .bss (which may not be true), and that _end is just after _bss (which also may not be true). This allows an i386 kernel linked with lld 7.0.0 to boot successfully.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab530bf0dd
commit
f3e1dfebeb
@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ SECTIONS
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
.data1 : { *(.data1) }
|
.data1 : { *(.data1) }
|
||||||
_edata = .; PROVIDE (edata = .);
|
_edata = .; PROVIDE (edata = .);
|
||||||
__bss_start = .;
|
|
||||||
.bss :
|
.bss :
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
__bss_start = .;
|
||||||
*(.dynbss)
|
*(.dynbss)
|
||||||
*(.bss .bss.* .gnu.linkonce.b.*)
|
*(.bss .bss.* .gnu.linkonce.b.*)
|
||||||
*(COMMON)
|
*(COMMON)
|
||||||
@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ SECTIONS
|
|||||||
FIXME: Why do we need it? When there is no .bss section, we don't
|
FIXME: Why do we need it? When there is no .bss section, we don't
|
||||||
pad the .data section. */
|
pad the .data section. */
|
||||||
. = ALIGN(. != 0 ? 32 / 8 : 1);
|
. = ALIGN(. != 0 ? 32 / 8 : 1);
|
||||||
|
__bss_end = .;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
. = ALIGN(32 / 8);
|
. = ALIGN(32 / 8);
|
||||||
. = ALIGN(32 / 8);
|
. = ALIGN(32 / 8);
|
||||||
|
@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ NON_GPROF_ENTRY(btext)
|
|||||||
* inactive from now until we switch to new ones, since we don't load any
|
* inactive from now until we switch to new ones, since we don't load any
|
||||||
* more segment registers or permit interrupts until after the switch.
|
* more segment registers or permit interrupts until after the switch.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
movl $end,%ecx
|
movl $__bss_end,%ecx
|
||||||
movl $edata,%edi
|
movl $__bss_start,%edi
|
||||||
subl %edi,%ecx
|
subl %edi,%ecx
|
||||||
xorl %eax,%eax
|
xorl %eax,%eax
|
||||||
cld
|
cld
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user