sort(1): randomcoll: Skip the memory allocation entirely
There's no reason to order based on strcmp of ASCII digests instead of memcmp of the raw digests. While here, remove collision fallback. If you collide two MD5s, they're probably the same string anyway. If robustness against MD5 collisions is desired, maybe we shouldn't use MD5. None of the behavior of sort -R is specified by POSIX, so we're free to implement this however we like. E.g., using a 128-bit counter and block cipher to generate unique indices for each line of input. PR: 230792 (2/many) Relnotes: This will change the sort order for a given dataset with a given seed. Other similarly breaking changes are planned. Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
This commit is contained in:
parent
02c8dd7d72
commit
fff4eaebbf
@ -990,8 +990,7 @@ randomcoll(struct key_value *kv1, struct key_value *kv2,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bwstring *s1, *s2;
|
||||
MD5_CTX ctx1, ctx2;
|
||||
char *b1, *b2;
|
||||
int cmp_res;
|
||||
unsigned char hash1[MD5_DIGEST_LENGTH], hash2[MD5_DIGEST_LENGTH];
|
||||
|
||||
s1 = kv1->k;
|
||||
s2 = kv2->k;
|
||||
@ -1004,24 +1003,16 @@ randomcoll(struct key_value *kv1, struct key_value *kv2,
|
||||
if (s1 == s2)
|
||||
return (0);
|
||||
|
||||
memcpy(&ctx1,&md5_ctx,sizeof(MD5_CTX));
|
||||
memcpy(&ctx2,&md5_ctx,sizeof(MD5_CTX));
|
||||
memcpy(&ctx1, &md5_ctx, sizeof(MD5_CTX));
|
||||
memcpy(&ctx2, &md5_ctx, sizeof(MD5_CTX));
|
||||
|
||||
MD5Update(&ctx1, bwsrawdata(s1), bwsrawlen(s1));
|
||||
MD5Update(&ctx2, bwsrawdata(s2), bwsrawlen(s2));
|
||||
b1 = MD5End(&ctx1, NULL);
|
||||
b2 = MD5End(&ctx2, NULL);
|
||||
if (b1 == NULL || b2 == NULL)
|
||||
err(2, "MD5End");
|
||||
|
||||
cmp_res = strcmp(b1,b2);
|
||||
sort_free(b1);
|
||||
sort_free(b2);
|
||||
MD5Final(hash1, &ctx1);
|
||||
MD5Final(hash2, &ctx2);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cmp_res)
|
||||
cmp_res = bwscoll(s1, s2, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
return (cmp_res);
|
||||
return (memcmp(hash1, hash2, sizeof(hash1)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user