This warning is very rarely useful (inline is a hint and not mandatory).
This flag results in many warnings being printed when compiling C++
code that uses the standard library with GCC.
This flag was originally added in back in r94332 but the flag is a no-op
in Clang ("This diagnostic flag exists for GCC compatibility, and has no
effect in Clang"). Removing it should make the GCC build output slightly
more readable.
Reviewed By: jrtc27, imp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29235
The CROSS_TOOLCHAIN GCC .mk files include -B${CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX}, so
GCC will select the right linker and we don't need to warn.
While here also apply 17b8b8fb5f to kern.mk.
Test Plan: no more warning printed with CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=mips-gcc6
Reviewed By: jhb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D29015
As suggested in D27598. This also supports MK_WERROR.clang=no and
MK_WERROR.gcc=no to support the existing NO_WERROR.<compiler> uses.
Reviewed By: brooks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27601
Clang 12 warns about passing a path to -fuse-ld and -Werror makes that
an error preventing building world without this change.
Reviewed by: arichardson, emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26591
The current default is provided in various Makefile.inc in some top-level
directories and covers a good portion of the tree, but doesn't cover parts
of the build a little deeper (e.g. libcasper).
Provide a default in src.sys.mk and set WARNS to it in bsd.sys.mk if that
variable is defined. This lets us relatively cleanly provide a default WARNS
no matter where you're building in the src tree without breaking things
outside of the tree.
Crunchgen has been updated as a bootstrap tool to work on this change
because it needs r365605 at a minimum to succeed. The cleanup necessary to
successfully walk over this change on WITHOUT_CLEAN builds has been added.
There is a supplemental project to this to list all of the warnings that are
encountered when the environment has WARNS=6 NO_WERROR=yes:
https://warns.kevans.dev -- this project will hopefully eventually go away
in favor of CI doing a much better job than it.
Reviewed by: emaste, brooks, ngie (all earlier version)
Reviewed by: emaste, arichardson (depend-cleanup.sh change)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26455
Use MACHINE_CPUARCH with arm64 (aarch64) when we build code that could run
on any 64-bit Arm instruction set. This will simplify checks in downstream
consumers targeting prototype instruction sets.
The only place we check for MACHINE_ARCH == aarch64 is when building the
device tree blobs. As these are targeting current generation ISAs.
Sponsored by: Innovate UK
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26370
When using relative paths for the linker we have to transform the name
since clang does not like -fuse-ld=ld.lld and instead requires -fuse-ld=lld
(the same also applies for ld.bfd).
This is needed so that setting LD/XLD is not ignored when linking with $CC
instead of directly using $LD. Currently only clang accepts an absolute
path for -fuse-ld= (Clang 12+ will add a new --ld-path flag), so we now
warn when building with GCC and $LD != "ld" since that might result in the
wrong linker being used.
We have been setting XLD=/path/to/cheri/ld.lld in CheriBSD for a long time and
used a similar version of this patch to avoid linking with /usr/bin/ld.
This change is also required when building FreeBSD on an Ubuntu with Clang:
In that case we set XCC=/usr/lib/llvm-10/bin/clang and since
/usr/lib/llvm-10/bin/ does not contain a "ld" binary the build fails with
`clang: error: unable to execute command: Executable "ld" doesn't exist!`
unless we pass -fuse-ld=/usr/lib/llvm-10/bin/ld.lld.
This change passes -fuse-ld instead of copying ${XLD} to WOLRDTMP/bin/ld
since then we would have to ensure that this file does not exist while
building the bootstrap tools. The cross-linker might not be compatible with
the host linker (e.g. when building on macos: host-linker= Mach-O /usr/bin/ld,
cross-linker=LLVM ld.lld).
Reviewed By: brooks, emaste
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26055
ports/devel/linux_libusb builds FreeBSD libusb with GCC 4.8.5
from devel/linux-c7-devtools. Restore the tests for older GCC
in bsd.sys.mk to accomodate such ports.
Reported by: tijl
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Assume gcc is at least 6.4, the oldest xtoolchain in the ports tree.
Assume clang is at least 6, which was in 11.2-RELEASE. Drop conditions
for older compilers.
Reviewed by: imp (earlier version), emaste, jhb
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24802
By using -nobuiltininc and adding the clang builtin headers resource dir
to the end of the compiler header search path, we can still find headers
such as immintrin.h but find the FreeBSD version of stddef.h/stdarg.h/..
first.
This is a workaround until we are able to settle on and complete a plan
to harmonize guard macros with LLVM. We've mostly worked out this on
FreeBSD systems by removing select headers from the installed set of
devel/llvm*, but that isn't a good solution for cross build.
Submitted by: arichardson
Obtained from: CheriBSD
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17002
Disable the warning for WARNS <= 3. This is lame, but it's what we
already do for the clang build.
Reviewed by: dim
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22889
std::auto_ptr in a whole bunch of individual Makefiles, make the warning
globally non-fatal instead. This is similar to what was done to many
more non-fatal warnings from newer gcc versions.
As discussed on arch@, gcc 4.2.1 is on its way out. Turn off Werror on gcc
versions < 5.0 permantly. This will allow older platforms to continue to compile
w/o new errors once we take them out of universe by default. This will also free
developers from chasing down obsolete warnings that produce no beneficial
changes to the source.
Discussed on: arch@
Reviewed by: jhb@, emaste@, pfg@
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21378
It is part of -Wformat, which is enabled by -Wall. Empty format strings are
well defined and it is perfectly reasonable to expect them in a formatting
interface.
Some warning flags are valid for C++ but not C. GCC 8 complains if you pass
such flags when building a C file. Using a separate variable for these
flags allows building both C and C++ files in the same directory (such as
the fusefs tests) under GCC.
Reviewed by: cem, emaste
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21116
r345708 worked for the base system, but unfortunately, caused a lot of
disruption for third-party packages that relied on C++, since bsd.sys.mk is
used by applications outside the base system. The defaults picked didn't match
the compiler's defaults and broke some builds that didn't specify a standard,
as well as some that overrode the value by setting `-std=gnu++14` (for
example) manually.
This change takes a more relaxed approach to appending `-std=${CXXSTD}` to
CXXFLAGS, by only doing so when the value is specified, as opposed to
overriding the standard set by an end-user. This avoids the need for having
to bake NOP default into bsd.sys.mk for supported compiler-toolchain
versions.
In order to make this change possible, add CXXSTD to Makefile snippets which
relied on the default value (c++11) added in r345708.
MFC after: 2 weeks
MFC with: r345708, r346574
Reviewed by: emaste
Reported by: jbeich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19895 (as part of a larger change)
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
When a review is closed via Phabricator it updates the patch attached to the
review. I downloaded the raw patch from Phabricator, applied it, and repeated
my mistake from r345704 by accident mixing content from D19732 and D19738.
For my own personal sanity, I will try not to mix reviews like this in the
future.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345706
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
I accidentally committed code from two reviews. I will reintroduce the code to
bsd.progs.mk as part of a separate commit from r345704.
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
MFC after: 2 months
MFC with: r345704
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
large atomic operation may incur significant performance penalty" ) for
arm before armv6. Since on these older architectures atomic operations
are always translated to libcalls, and this is expected, the warning is
not really useful there.
dirdeps.mk and meta.autodep.mk will now look for
Makefile.depend.options
to handle optional dependencies, the work is all done by
dirdeps-options.mk
Also update to latest meta.stage.mk and gendirdeps.mk
Reviewed by: bdrewery
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15701
r332090 added a LINKER_TYPE test to add the --no-rosegment flag when
linking the i386 loader components with lld. Instead, introduce a
general mechanism for setting LDFLAGS for a specific linker type,
and use it for --no-rosegment.
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14998
new clang 6.0.0 -Wtautological-constant-compare warning to the WARNS <=
6 level. (This warning is still being worked on upstream to reduce
false positives, but it is currently still too trigger happy.)
