- deprecate routes#N, as it is hard to keep consistency with
rtprefixN. accept any number of "rtprefix", "rtrefix0",
..., "rtprefix99".
- deprecate "addrs#N", as it is difficult for users to keep
consistency with "addrN".
accept 100 prefix info in maximum - like "addr", "addr0"
... "addr99". WARNS=2 clean on netbsd.
old configuration file should work just fine.
behavior change:
previously, we rejected "addrN" if there's "addr", and we rejected
"addr" if there is "addrN". now we accept both without problem.
- when an advertised prefix configured from the kernel has been added
or invalidated, notice the change in a short delay.
- when invalidating a prefix, do not bark even if there is
inconsistency about prefix lifetimes.
- wrap more specific route info code into ROUTEINFO.
Obtained from: KAME
MFC after: 1 week
was removed from the kernel;
Advertise the prefix with zero lifetimes rather than to remove the prefix
from the prefix list to be advertised.
This will help renumber a receiving host by deprecating the address
derived from the old prefix.
Obtained from: KAME
MFC after: 2 weeks
Avoid using parenthesis enclosure macros (.Pq and .Po/.Pc) with plain text.
Not only this slows down the mdoc(7) processing significantly, but it also
has an undesired (in this case) effect of disabling hyphenation within the
entire enclosed block.
This work was based on kame-20010528-freebsd43-snap.tgz and some
critical problem after the snap was out were fixed.
There are many many changes since last KAME merge.
TODO:
- The definitions of SADB_* in sys/net/pfkeyv2.h are still different
from RFC2407/IANA assignment because of binary compatibility
issue. It should be fixed under 5-CURRENT.
- ip6po_m member of struct ip6_pktopts is no longer used. But, it
is still there because of binary compatibility issue. It should
be removed under 5-CURRENT.
Reviewed by: itojun
Obtained from: KAME
MFC after: 3 weeks
- avoid to use freed (by freeifaddrs) data
- 1st try getifaddrs, then try SIOCGIFMTU as the last resort
Submitted by: JINMEI Tatuya <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
Obtained from: KAME Project
KAME put INET6 related stuff into sys/netinet6 dir, but IPv6
standard API(RFC2553) require following files to be under sys/netinet.
netinet/ip6.h
netinet/icmp6.h
Now those header files just include each following files.
netinet6/ip6.h
netinet6/icmp6.h
Also KAME has netinet6/in6.h for easy INET6 common defs
sharing between different BSDs, but RFC2553 requires only
netinet/in.h should be included from userland.
So netinet/in.h also includes netinet6/in6.h inside.
To keep apps portability, apps should not directly include
above files from netinet6 dir.
Ideally, all contents of,
netinet6/ip6.h
netinet6/icmp6.h
netinet6/in6.h
should be moved into
netinet/ip6.h
netinet/icmp6.h
netinet/in.h
but to avoid big changes in this stage, add some hack, that
-Put some special macro define into those files under neitnet
-Let files under netinet6 cause error if it is included
from some apps, and, if the specifal macro define is not
defined.
(which should have been defined if files under netinet is
included)
-And let them print an error message which tells the
correct name of the include file to be included.
Also fix apps which includes invalid header files.
Approved by: jkh
Obtained from: KAME project
