5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
gnn
b67748dabd MFC: 281529
I can find no reason to allow packets with both SYN and FIN bits
set past this point in the code. The packet should be dropped and
not massaged as it is here.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2266
Submitted by: eri
Sponsored by: Rubicon Communications (Netgate)
2015-05-09 19:36:30 +00:00
glebius
f937dcf2bd Bulk sync of pf changes from head, in attempt to fixup broken build I
made in r263029.

Merge r257186,257215,257349,259736,261797.

These changesets split pfvar.h into several smaller headers and make
userland utilities to include only some of them.
2014-03-12 10:45:58 +00:00
glebius
52213d7415 In netpfil/pf:
- Add my copyright to files I've touched a lot this year.
  - Add dash in front of all copyright notices according to style(9).
  - Move $OpenBSD$ down below copyright notices.
  - Remove extra line between cdefs.h and __FBSDID.
2012-12-28 09:19:49 +00:00
pjd
c4178b76f6 Warn about reaching various PF limits.
Reviewed by:	glebius
Obtained from:	WHEEL Systems
2012-12-17 10:10:13 +00:00
glebius
0ccf4838d7 o Create directory sys/netpfil, where all packet filters should
reside, and move there ipfw(4) and pf(4).

o Move most modified parts of pf out of contrib.

Actual movements:

sys/contrib/pf/net/*.c		-> sys/netpfil/pf/
sys/contrib/pf/net/*.h		-> sys/net/
contrib/pf/pfctl/*.c		-> sbin/pfctl
contrib/pf/pfctl/*.h		-> sbin/pfctl
contrib/pf/pfctl/pfctl.8	-> sbin/pfctl
contrib/pf/pfctl/*.4		-> share/man/man4
contrib/pf/pfctl/*.5		-> share/man/man5

sys/netinet/ipfw		-> sys/netpfil/ipfw

The arguable movement is pf/net/*.h -> sys/net. There are
future plans to refactor pf includes, so I decided not to
break things twice.

Not modified bits of pf left in contrib: authpf, ftp-proxy,
tftp-proxy, pflogd.

The ipfw(4) movement is planned to be merged to stable/9,
to make head and stable match.

Discussed with:		bz, luigi
2012-09-14 11:51:49 +00:00