Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
imp
2344bfa174 Complete the transition away from newbus to populate the children to
the linker set of CPU modules.  The newbus method, although clever,
had many flaws: it didn't really support multiple SoC, many of the
comments about order were just wrong, and it did a few things far too
late to be useful.  delay and cpu_reset now work much earlier in the
boot process.
2012-07-12 13:45:58 +00:00
imp
d3c013c5a4 Create the children devices for the SoC in atmelarm bus node, not in
the identify routine of the CPU.
2012-07-12 04:23:11 +00:00
imp
8cc7a49b96 Export the interrupt status vector via soc_data. Set the interrupt
priorities in the AIC in the atmelarm driver before attaching the
children.  Delete redunant copies of the code.
2012-07-12 02:58:45 +00:00
imp
515d0c1d29 Make the SoC stuff a little more modular, and start to move away from
having the CPU device that's a child of atmelarm that does stuff.

o Create a linker_set for the support fucntions for the SoCs.
o Rename soc_data to soc_info.
o Move the delay and reset function pointers to new soc_data struct
o Create elements for all known SoCs
o Add lookup of the SoC we found, and print a warning if it isn't one
  we know about.
2012-07-11 20:17:14 +00:00
imp
e53b15fec4 Go ahead and disable the interrupts for the DBGU the boot loader may
have left enabled after we detect the CPU, and remove the multiplely
copied code from the SoC modules.
2012-07-10 19:48:42 +00:00
imp
296ee98cf6 Remove a useless bit of indirection. On all Atmel ARM products, irq 1
is the system IRQ, so use the define for it and get on with life.
2012-07-10 15:02:29 +00:00
imp
06d108a4b9 Collapse all copies of at91_add_child into at91.c. They were
logically identical before today, and actually identical after today's
changes.
2012-07-10 04:17:49 +00:00
imp
af7577bff3 Missed one of the special AT91SAM9xxx_BASE defines. This should be
AT91_BASE.
2012-07-10 02:44:15 +00:00
imp
64e33d51d9 The system IRQ is always IRQ 1. Make it so. 2012-07-10 02:39:03 +00:00
marius
ff81900109 Unbreak after r236658 by comparing the right things. 2012-06-18 19:22:10 +00:00
imp
826e2b55c7 Remove stray break; that resulted from a last-minute, untested change. 2012-06-06 14:31:14 +00:00
imp
691dfc2d38 Enhance the Atmel SoC chip identification routines to account for more
SoC variants.  Fold the AT91SAM9XE chips into the AT91SAM9260
handling, where appropriate.  The following SoCs/SoC families are recognized:
	at91cap9, at91rm9200, at91sam9260, at91sam9261, at91sam9263,
	at91sam9g10, at91sam9g20, at91sam9g45, at91sam9n12, at91sam9rl,
	at91sam9x5
and the following variations are also recognized:
	at91rm9200_bga, at91rm9200_pqfp, at91sam9xe, at91sam9g45, at91sam9m10,
	at91sam9g46, at91sam9m11, at91sam9g15, at91sam9g25, at91sam9g35,
	at91sam9x25, at91sam9x35
This is only the identification routine: no additional Atmel devices
are supported at this time.

# With these changes, I'm able to boot to the point of identification
# on a few different Atmel SoCs that we don't yet support using the
# KB920X config file -- someday tht will be an ATMEL config file...
2012-06-06 06:19:52 +00:00
marius
c2d55bde65 Add support for the Atmel SAM9XE familiy of microcontrollers, which
consist of a ARM926EJ-S processor core with up to 512 Kbytes of on-chip
flash. Tested with SAM9XE512.
2012-04-14 17:09:38 +00:00
marius
66d2871df6 - Try to bring these files closer to style(9).
- Use DEVMETHOD_END.
- Use NULL instead of 0 for pointers.
2012-04-14 11:29:32 +00:00
cognet
3a67028003 Add support for the AT91SAM9260
Submitted by:	Greg Ansley
2010-10-06 22:40:27 +00:00