Reduce the size of ed a little by removing some CIS based entries (others
likely can be removed too):
o The D-Link DFE-670TXD doesn't need its own entry based on strings.
o The Xircom CompactCard appears to be a TDK design, so list it there by ID
and remove the strings.
Increase the size of ed a little:
o Add support for the Addtron AE-660CT and Addtron AE-660. This is a very
generic NE-2000 clone (so generic that its CIS tags say NE-2000 generic
card!).
o Note that the first 255 locations are reserved for JEDEC Ids from
publication 106 (current revision Q, each one verified with
JEDEC and the PMCICA).
o Move ADAPTEC2 to the right section.
o Sort TOSHIBA2 numerically.
o Add Agere Hermes II and II.5 PC Cards (from zipit web page), TDK
GlobalNetworker 3410 (from dmesg for my card) and another alternate
PANASONIC KXLC0005_2 (from pcmcia-cs id lists).
problems we were having properly mapping the CIS attr space on some
cards. Those problems have been solved other ways, so this kludge is
no longer necessary. Remove it and have pccards come up a whole
second faster.
o Use pf more consistantly for pccard_function.
o Make sure we quote the strings properly (maybe this function belongs in
subr_bus.c)
o Tweak a comment to be more accurate after code changed.
scan the CIS for interesting tuples. 95% of what can be obtained from
the CIS is harvested by the pccard layer and presented to the user in
standard function calls. However, there are special needs at times
where the standard stuff doesn't suffice. This is for those special
cases.
CARD_SCAN_CIS(device_get_parent(dev), function, argp)
scans the CIS of the card, passing each tuple to function with
the tuple and argp as its arguments. Returning 0 continues the scan,
while returning 1 terminates the scan. The value of the last
invocation of function is returned from this function.
int (*pccard_scan_t)(struct pccard_tuple *tuple, void *argp)
function called for each tuple. Elements of the CIS tuple can be
read with pccard_tuple_read_{1,2,3,4,n}(). You are reading
the actual tuple memory each time, in case your card has
registers in the CIS.
# I suppose these things should be documented in pccard(4) or something like
# that.
# I plan on unifying cardbus CIS support in a similar way.
Approved by: re (scottl)
Provide a backwards compatible way to have the extra macro by defining
PCCARD_API_LEVEL 5 before including pccarddevs for driver writers that
want/need to have the same driver on 5 and 6 with pccard attachments.
Approved by: re (dwhite)
problems here, it became clear we were being too complex.
o Don't keep track of resources in two places
o Use resource_list_purge instead of rolling our own
o Just reassign the ownership of the resource, rather than freeing it
and reallocating it.
o Fix compile problems when sizeof(u_long) != sizeof(int)
this code:
o rid is stored in the resource, so don't bother keeping track of it here.
o Implement memory space
o Don't try to activate 'memory card' CFEs. This is type memory, as opposed
to the memory resource.
resource_list_find. Check to make sure that rle is not NULL and panic
if it is (but it appears that resource_list_add already panics, so I'm
not entirely sure it is necessary now).
Add a test to make sure we have a interrupt resource when we're
disabling it. This is also a cannot happen, but the extra care
shoudln't hurt.
Found by: Coventry tool via sam@
last in the list rather than first.
This makes the resouces print in the 4.x order rather than the 5.x order
(eg fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 is 4.x, but 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 is 5.x). This
also means that the pci code will once again print the resources in BAR
ascending order.
chipset. Add support for this card. Office Max has them on sale and
I was surprised that we didn't have it in our supported list when I
plugged it in...
are equal to PCCARD_TPCE_FS_MEMSPACE_NONE, memspace will be zero, so
testing for this case inside of the if statement results in dead code.
We'd fail to set a value to zero that's already zero (since it is
initialized to 0 indirectly) with this code being there. Well, except
in the very rare case that we have a card that has a defualt entry
that includes a memory space followed by one that has no memory space
(these are extremely rare, I don't recall ever having seen one :-).
Fix this by setting num_memspace to 0 in a more appropriate place.
Submitted by: Coverity Prevent analysis tool
with the latest changes. They actually have valid ROM data at location
0 of memory, just like a real NE-2000 ISA card. Use this data, if
the ROM passes a few basic tests, as an additional source for the MAC
address. Prefer the CIS over this source, but have it take precidence
over falling back to reading the attribtue memory.
o Minor cleanup of a few devices that we match on based on CIS string.
bridge between OLDCARD and NEWCARD for drivers to inquire after the
function number (eg, 0, 1, 2). Nobody ever used it, so retire it
with honors. NEWCARD never implemented it, and the same information
can be obtained by the pccard_get_function_number().
MFC After: 3 days
same as the LINKSYS COMBO_ECARD (which also seems to be the same as
another linksys product that also has a modem, but I can't find that
one at the moment). Remove the PCM100, since it is now no longer
used.
CIS, weren't actually used anywhere (other than the generic PC Card
code when certain variables are defined). They aren't used in NetBSD
either. Make things simpler by removing them. Change PLANEX_2 to
PLANEX and tweak wi and owi to use that instead. The PLANEX id seems
to actually be pci ID assigned to planex, not its pcmcia id. Ooops.
I don't know if this is a reporting error from where this entry came
from, or if it is a mistake on PLANEX's part. I suspect the latter,
as ACTIONTEC and NEWMEDIA made the same mistake (although new media
may be because it uses an advansys chip inside). Make a note of this
in the file. The 0xc entires may be JEITA assigned, so note that as
well.
# This leaves just 3 entries that are totally unknown: airvast, archos
# and edimax although the arivast number is the same assigned to
# avertec in usb...
thought. I'm unsure why I thought this was the case, but it
definitely isn't for this card. If another card with the other ID
makes an appearance, then we'll add a second entry for it.
# With this change my Olicom OC2220 is now working again, since I make
# this commit with that device. :-)
