Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ache
ac9461d96b Cleanup #includes 1997-10-16 13:35:25 +00:00
peter
b998805f25 Give up on the "try and compensate for broken programs" cruft and revert
back to the original single nanosleep() implementation.  This is POSIX and
Unix98 (aka single-unix spec v2) compliant behavior.  If a program sets
alarm(2) or an interval timer (setitimer(2)) without a SIGALRM handler
being active, sleep(3) will no longer absorb it, and the program will get
what it asked for..... :-]

The original reason for this in the first place (apache) doesn't seem to
need it anymore, according to Andrey.

Reviewed by: ache, bde
1997-10-15 14:06:15 +00:00
ache
4dd0f70342 Back out itimerfix hack since nanosleep1 fixed now
Handle syscalls error return slightly better
1997-08-13 18:13:17 +00:00
ache
73828b4148 Rearrange itimerfix loop doing it inside SIGALRM handling section 1997-08-12 19:54:31 +00:00
ache
3a0de699cf Solve itimerfix() problem completely by using loop in 100000000 secs chunks 1997-08-12 19:47:01 +00:00
ache
f9a8aa567e Back out my installation of SIGALRM handler even if it is blocked
and return to previous Peter's variant.
POSIX says that this place is implementation defined and old variant allows
application block SIGALRM and sleep and not be killed by external SIGALRMs.
BTW, GNU sleep f.e. sleeps forever in blocked SIGALRM :-)
1997-08-12 19:14:54 +00:00
ache
2a8b6ff057 Make itimerfix hack better: return the time we can't sleep at once 1997-08-12 15:46:05 +00:00
joerg
d50ebd355c Hack^H^H^H^Hworkaround for itimerfix(9) gratuitously limiting the
acceptable range for tv_sec to the magic number 100000000 (which at
least ought to be declared in a header file, and explained in the
non-existing man page, as well as in the existing man pages for
nanosleep(2) & Co.).

PR:		bin/4259
1997-08-10 12:16:13 +00:00
peter
8bdc2de582 Make sleep() and usleep() "eat" any stray SIGALRM signals during the
lifetime of the call, just like the old implementation did.  Previously,
we were only eating them if the application did not call sleep()/usleep()
with SIGALRM masked.

Submitted by:	ache
1997-07-18 09:48:37 +00:00
peter
be1ae320cc Re-activate the nanosleep style using code, but with the signal handling
semantics of the old sleep for compatability with a few decades of expected
side effects.  Apache breaks if we just use nanosleep() for some reason,
here we use a new signanosleep() syscall which is kinda like a hybrid of
sigsuspend and nanosleep..

Reviewed by:  ache (and tested on his apache that was failing when
                    sleep used plain nanosleep)
1997-06-02 16:30:22 +00:00
peter
ea6c9e20fb Update the sleep(3)/usleep(3) code to use signanosleep(2) if compiled with
-DUSE_NANOSLEEP.  Also, seperate the code for _THREAD_SAFE so that it uses
the simpler threaded nanosleep() call in libc_r..  We don't go to the same
extremes for emulating traditional sleep semantics (ie: eating any SIGALRM
that might happen) which things like apache seem to depend on.
1997-06-01 09:27:03 +00:00
peter
9e3a2a0c2b Update the nanosleep versions to set a SIGALRM handler while sleeping.
This appears to appease Apache, although depending on having sleep(3)
changing the SIGALRM handler is a bit bogus.
1997-05-18 10:57:49 +00:00
peter
ee42839b4f round-up non-zero nanoseconds in #ifdef'ed code. 1997-05-17 15:41:08 +00:00
peter
01e3d5c705 Allow conditional use (add -DUSE_NANOSLEEP) to CFLAGS of nanosleep() for
the backend of sleep(3) and usleep(3).  It's off by default until the
problem is fixed.
1997-05-17 11:40:58 +00:00
ache
eebddce2d9 Temporarily restore old (itimer) sleep variant because new one
(nanosleep) breaks Apache httpd badly: his childs died quickly after
number of requests (SIGPIPE). To reproduce this bug start
gdb /usr/local/sbin/httpd
run -X

and make some bunch of concurent requests (load the server pages
from 3 different places f.e.)
After short time httpd dies via SIGPIPE. It never dies with old sleep.c

In real life it looks like lots of broken images on the pages or missing
pages. Lynx says about Network read error, etc.
It seems something wrong in nanosleep signal handling.
1997-05-17 08:32:42 +00:00
peter
fe06c5f909 Use nanosleep() in all cases, not just in the reentrant libc (_THREAD_SAFE)
version.
1997-05-12 10:04:57 +00:00
nate
934efd0502 ts_sec -> tv_sec
ts_nsec -> tv_nsec
1996-09-20 06:06:28 +00:00
julian
619b731f5b Reviewed by: julian and (hsu?)
Submitted by:	 John Birrel(L?)

changes for threadsafe operations
1996-01-22 00:02:33 +00:00
phk
5e221828f8 Minor cleanup, mostly unused vars and missing #includes. 1995-10-22 14:37:11 +00:00
rgrimes
be22b15ae2 BSD 4.4 Lite Lib Sources 1994-05-27 05:00:24 +00:00