If there is a write error on stdout, a message will be printed (to stderr)
and the exit status will be changed to 2 if it would have been 0 or 1.
PR: bin/158206
Examples:
export x=~
now expands the tilde
local y=$1
is now safe, even if $1 contains IFS characters or metacharacters.
For a word to "look like an assignment", it must start with a name followed
by an equals sign, none of which may be quoted.
The special treatment applies when the first word (potentially after
"command") is "export", "readonly" or "local". There may be quoting
characters but no expansions. If "local" is overridden with a function there
is no special treatment ("export" and "readonly" cannot be overridden with a
function).
If things like
local arr=(1 2 3)
are ever allowed in the future, they cannot call a "local" function. This
would either be a run-time error or it would call the builtin.
This matches Austin Group bug #351, planned for the next issue of POSIX.1.
PR: bin/166771
It is planned to expand variable assignments as assignments (no word
splitting, different tilde expansion) when they follow a "declaration
utility" (export, readonly or local). However, a quoted character cannot be
part of a "name" so things like \v=~ are not assignments, and the existing
behaviour applies.
test.
POSIX says that SIGPIPE affects a process and therefore a SIGPIPE caused and
received by a subshell environment may or may not affect the parent shell
environment.
The change assumes that ${SH} is executed in a new process. This must be the
case if it contains a slash and everyone appears to do so anyway even though
POSIX might permit otherwise.
This change makes builtins/wait3.0 work in ksh93.
In the first command of a 'for', $? should be the exit status of the last
pipeline (command substitution in the word list or command before 'for'),
not always 0.
Before this fix, only the first statement of the trap was executed if
evalskip was set. This is for example the case when:
o "-e" is set for this shell
o a trap is set on EXIT
o a function returns 1 and causes the script to abort
Reviewed by: jilles
MFC after: 2 weeks
Also, rework evalcase() to not evaluate any tree. Instead, return the
NCLISTFALLTHRU node and handle it in evaltree().
Fixed bugs:
* If a ;& list with non-zero exit status is followed by an empty ;; or final
list, the exit status of the case command should be equal to the exit
status of the ;& list, not 0.
* An empty ;& case should not reset $?.
* If no pattern is matched, POSIX says the exit status shall be 0 (even if
there are command substitutions).
* If a pattern is matched and there are no command substitutions, the first
command should see the $? from before the case command, not always 0.
The errno message display added in r222292 did not take attempting to
cd to a non-directory or something that cannot be stat()ed into account.
PR: bin/164070
MFC after: 10 days
POSIX says the exit status of a for loop without any items shall be 0. There
are no exceptions if the exit status of the previous command was not 0 or if
the item list contains a command substitution with non-zero exit status.
Replacing ;; with the new control operator ;& will cause the next list to be
executed as well without checking its pattern, continuing until a list ends
with ;; or until the end of the case statement. This is like omitting
"break" in a C "switch" statement.
The sequence ;& was formerly invalid.
This feature is proposed for the next POSIX issue in Austin Group issue
#449.
The eval special builtin now runs the code with EV_EXIT if it was run
with EV_EXIT itself.
In particular, this eliminates one fork when a command substitution contains
an eval command that ends with an external program or a subshell.
This is similar to what r220978 did for functions.
The function name expandstr() and the general idea of doing this kind of
expansion by treating the text as a here document without end marker is from
dash.
All variants of parameter expansion and arithmetic expansion also work (the
latter is not required by POSIX but it does not take extra code and many
other shells also allow it).
Command substitution is prevented because I think it causes too much code to
be re-entered (for example creating an unbounded recursion of trace lines).
Unfortunately, our LINENO is somewhat crude, otherwise PS4='$LINENO+ ' would
be quite useful.
If the here-document is attached to a compound command or subshell, $?
already works properly. This is both a workaround for bin/41410 and a
requirement for a true fix for bin/41410.
PR: bin/41410
MFC after: 1 week
