There are number of radix consumers in kernel land (pf,ipfw,nfs,route)
with different requirements. In fact, first 3 don't have _any_ requirements
and first 2 does not use radix locking. On the other hand, routing
structure do have these requirements (rnh_gen, multipath, custom
to-be-added control plane functions, different locking).
Additionally, radix should not known anything about its consumers internals.
So, radix code now uses tiny 'struct radix_head' structure along with
internal 'struct radix_mask_head' instead of 'struct radix_node_head'.
Existing consumers still uses the same 'struct radix_node_head' with
slight modifications: they need to pass pointer to (embedded)
'struct radix_head' to all radix callbacks.
Routing code now uses new 'struct rib_head' with different locking macro:
RADIX_NODE_HEAD prefix was renamed to RIB_ (which stands for routing
information base).
New net/route_var.h header was added to hold routing subsystem internal
data. 'struct rib_head' was placed there. 'struct rtentry' will also
be moved there soon.
very questionable, since it makes vimages more dependent on each other. But
the reason for the backout is that it screwed up shutting down the pf purge
threads, and now kernel immedially panics on pf module unload. Although module
unloading isn't an advertised feature of pf, it is very important for
development process.
I'd like to not backout r276746, since in general it is good. But since it
has introduced numerous build breakages, that later were addressed in
r276841, r276756, r276747, I need to back it out as well. Better replay it
in clean fashion from scratch.
Split functions that initialize various pf parts into their
vimage parts and global parts.
Since global parts appeared to be only mutex initializations, just
abandon them and use MTX_SYSINIT() instead.
Kill my incorrect VNET_FOREACH() iterator and instead use correct
approach with VNET_SYSINIT().
PR: 194515
Differential Revision: D1309
Submitted by: glebius, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com>
Reviewed by: trociny, zec, gnn
- Add my copyright to files I've touched a lot this year.
- Add dash in front of all copyright notices according to style(9).
- Move $OpenBSD$ down below copyright notices.
- Remove extra line between cdefs.h and __FBSDID.
we are actually editing table, which means editing rules,
thus we need writer access to 'em.
Fix this by offloading the update of table to the same taskqueue,
we already use for flushing. Since taskqueues major task is now
overloading, and flushing is optional, do mechanical rename
s/flush/overload/ in the code related to the taskqueue.
Since overloading tasks do unsafe referencing of rules, provide
a bandaid in pf_purge_unlinked_rules(). If the latter sees any
queued tasks, then it skips purging for this run.
In table code:
- Assert any lock in pfr_lookup_addr().
- Assert writer lock in pfr_route_kentry().
reside, and move there ipfw(4) and pf(4).
o Move most modified parts of pf out of contrib.
Actual movements:
sys/contrib/pf/net/*.c -> sys/netpfil/pf/
sys/contrib/pf/net/*.h -> sys/net/
contrib/pf/pfctl/*.c -> sbin/pfctl
contrib/pf/pfctl/*.h -> sbin/pfctl
contrib/pf/pfctl/pfctl.8 -> sbin/pfctl
contrib/pf/pfctl/*.4 -> share/man/man4
contrib/pf/pfctl/*.5 -> share/man/man5
sys/netinet/ipfw -> sys/netpfil/ipfw
The arguable movement is pf/net/*.h -> sys/net. There are
future plans to refactor pf includes, so I decided not to
break things twice.
Not modified bits of pf left in contrib: authpf, ftp-proxy,
tftp-proxy, pflogd.
The ipfw(4) movement is planned to be merged to stable/9,
to make head and stable match.
Discussed with: bz, luigi
