them, please let me know if not). Most of these are of the form:
static const struct bzzt_type {
[...list of members...]
} const bzzt_devs[] = {
[...list of initializers...]
};
The second const is unnecessary, as arrays cannot be modified anyway,
and if the elements are const, the whole thing is const automatically
(e.g. it is placed in .rodata).
I have verified this does not change the binary output of a full kernel
build (except for build timestamps embedded in the object files).
Reviewed by: yongari, marius
MFC after: 1 week
* introduce a new HAL API method to pull out the TX status descriptor
contents.
* Add num_delims to the 11n first aggr method. This isn't used by the
driver at the moment so it won't affect anything.
* Add some more ANI spur immunity levels.
* For AR5111 radios attached to an AR5212, limit the 5GHz channels
that are available. A later revision of the AR5111 supports the 4.9GHz
PSB channels but right now there's no check in place for the radio
revision.
If someone wants PSB support on AR5212+AR5111 radios then please let
me know and I'll add the relevant version check.
Obtained from: Qualcomm Atheros
the internet as "AR9380 and later which didn't get its PCI ID written
in at power-on", so it's hardly an unknown constant.
Obtained from: Qualcomm Atheros
AR5416 and AR9280, but leave it disabled by default.
TL;DR: don't enable this code at all unless you go through the process
of getting the NIC re-certified. This is purely to be used as a
reference and NOT a certified solution by any stretch of the imagination.
The background:
The AR5112 RF synth right up to the AR5133 RF synth (used on the AR5416,
derivative is used for the AR9130/AR9160) only implement down to 2.5MHz
channel spacing in 5GHz. Ie, the RF synth is programmed in steps of 2.5MHz
(or 5, 10, 20MHz.) So they can't represent the quarter rate channels
in the 4.9GHz PSB (which end in xxx2MHz and xxx7MHz). They support
fractional spacing in 2GHz (1MHz spacing) (or things wouldn't work,
right?)
So instead of doing this, the RF synth programming for the AR5112 and
later code will round to the nearest available frequency.
If all NICs were RF5112 or later, they'll inter-operate fine - they all
program the same. (And for reference, only the latest revision of the
RF5111 NICs do it, but the driver doesn't yet implement the programming.)
However:
* The AR5416 programming didn't at all implement the fractional synth
work around as above;
* The AR9280 programming actually programmed the accurate centre frequency
and thus wouldn't inter-operate with the legacy NICs.
So this patch:
* Implements the 4.9GHz PSB fractional synth workaround, exactly as the
RF5112 and later code does;
* Adds a very dirty workaround from me to calculate the same channel
centre "fudge" to the AR9280 code when operating on fractional frequencies
in 5GHz.
HOWEVER however:
It is disabled by default. Since the HAL didn't implement this feature,
it's highly unlikely that the AR5416 and AR928x has been tested in these
centre frequencies. There's a lot of regulatory compliance testing required
before a NIC can have this enabled - checking for centre frequency,
for drift, for synth spurs, for distortion and spectral mask compliance.
There's likely a lot of other things that need testing so please don't
treat this as an exhaustive, authoritative list. There's a perfectly good
process out there to get a NIC certified by your regulatory domain, please
go and engage someone to do that for you and pay the relevant fees.
If a company wishes to grab this work and certify existing 802.11n NICs
for work in these bands then please be my guest. The AR9280 works fine
on the correct fractional synth channels (49x2 and 49x7Mhz) so you don't
need to get certification for that. But the 500KHz offset hack may have
the above issues (spur, distortion, accuracy, etc) so you will need to
get the NIC recertified.
Please note that it's also CARD dependent. Just because the RF synth
will behave correctly doesn't at all mean that the card design will also
behave correctly. So no, I won't enable this by default if someone
verifies a specific AR5416/AR9280 NIC works. Please don't ask.
Tested:
I used the following NICs to do basic interoperability testing at
half and quarter rates. However, I only did very minimal spectrum
analyser testing (mostly "am I about to blow things up" testing;
not "certification ready" testing):
* AR5212 + AR5112 synth
* AR5413 + AR5413 synth
* AR5416 + AR5113 synth
* AR9280
This doesn't specifically fix the issue(s) i'm seeing in this 2GHz
environment (where setting/increasing spur immunity causes OFDM restart
errors to skyrocket through the roof; but leaving it at 0 would leave
the environment cleaner..)
Pointy-hat-to: me, for committing this broken code in the first place.
I'm not sure where in the deep, distant past I found the AR_PHY_MODE
registers for half/quarter rate mode, but unfortunately that doesn't
seem to work "right" for non-AR9280 chips.
Specifically:
* don't touch AR_PHY_MODE
* set the PLL bits when configuring half/quarter rate
I've verified this on the AR9280 (5ghz fast clock) and the AR5416.
The AR9280 works in both half/quarter rate; the AR5416 unfortunately
only currently works at half rate. It fails to calibrate on quarter rate.
No, this isn't HT/5 and HT/10 support. This is the 11a half/quarter
rate support primarily used by the 4.9GHz and GSM band regulatory
domains.
This is definitely a work in progress.
TODO:
* everything in the last commit;
* lots more interoperability testing with the AR5212 half/quarter rate
support for the relevant chips;
* Do some interop testing on half/quarter rate support between _all_
the 11n chips - AR5416, AR9160, AR9280 (and AR9285/AR9287 when 2GHz
half/quarter rate support is coded up.)
used when running the chips in half/quarter rate.
This sets up some default parameters which are then overridden by the
driver (which manually configures things like slot timing at interface
start time.)
Although this is a copy-and-modify from the AR5212 HAL, I did peek
at the reference HAL and the ath9k driver to see what they did.
Ath9k in particular doesn't hard-code this - instead, their version
of ar5416InitUserSettings() does all of the relevant math.
TODO:
* do the math, not hard code things!
* fix the mac clock calculation for the AR9287; since it runs the
MAC clock at a higher rate, requiring all the duration calculations
to change;
* Do a whole lot more validation for half/quarter rates.
Obtained from: Qualcomm Atheros, Linux ath9k
Some of the math is a little wrong thanks to clocks in 11a mode running
at 44MHz when in fast clock mode (rather than 40MHz, which the chips
before AR9280 ran 11a in). That'll have to be addressed in a future commit.
This fixes the incorrect slot (and likely ACK/RTS timeout) values
which I see when enabling half/quarter rate support on the AR9280.
The resulting math matches the expected calculated default values.
Fix the strong signal diversity capability setting - I had totally
messed up the indentation.
Set the default values to match what's in the .ini for now, rather than
what values I had previously gleaned from places. This seems to work
quite well for the early AR5212 NICs I have. Of course, later NICs
have different PHYs and the radar configuration is very card/board
dependent..
Tested:
* ath1: AR5212 mac 5.3 RF5111 phy 4.1
ath1: 2GHz radio: 0x0023; 5GHz radio: 0x0017
This detects 1, 5, 25, 50, 75, 100uS pulses reliably (with no interference.)
However, 10uS pulses don't detect reliably. That may be around the
transition between short and long pulses so some further tuning may
improve things.
up on (at least) the AR5413.
The 30 second summary - if a CRC error frame comes in during PHY error
processing, that CRC bit will be set for all subsequent frames until
a non-CRC error frame is processed.
So to allow for accurate PHY error processing (Radar, and ANI on the AR5212
HAL chips) just tag the frame as being both CRC and PHY - let the driver
decide what to do with it.
PR: kern/169362
some HAL definitions rather than local definitions.
The original source (ath9k) pulled this stuff from the QCA driver and
removed the HAL_* prefix. I'm just restoring the correct order of things.
Obtained from: Qualcomm Atheros
This is a re-implementation based on the reference carrier code
for the AR5413.
Tested:
* Pulse detection for AR5212 and AR5413, to ensure the
correct behaviour for both chips
PR: kern/170904
Obtained from: Qualcomm Atheros
The comparison assumes maxFirstepLevel is a count, rather than a maximum
value. The array is 3 entries in size however 'maxFirstepLevel' is 2.
This bug also exists in the AR5212 HAL.
* mfp support;
* 4.9ghz support in the HAL;
* device type - specifically, the bus type and whether it's a HB63
NIC (which requires some subtle chainmask handling differences
in the AR5416 HAL.)
Obtained from: Qualcomm Atheros
