subtle why it comes out the way it does. Once you realize that it
depends on the archiving order, it's also important to realize that
filesystem differences aren't going to break this case. (Some of the
other tests have had to be extensively rewritten to make them
independent of the order in which a particular filesystem returns file
entries.)
(This commit also serves to note the PR number that I accidentally
omitted from the previous commit.)
PR: bin/128562
MFC after: 30 days
good job writing this test; it exercises a lot of subtle cases. The
trickiest one is that a hardlink to something that didn't get
extracted should not itself be extracted. In some sense, this is not
the desired behavior (we'd rather restore the file), but it's the best
you can do in a single-pass restore of a tar archive.
The test here should be extended to exercise cpio and newc formats as
well, since their hardlink models are different, which will lead to
different handling of some of these edge cases.
Submitted by: Jaakko Heinonen
MFC after: 30 days
