- A couple of tests to check if the layout of the generated calenders
is correct.
- A couple of tests to see if impossible combinations for -3, -A,
-m, -y etc properly abort.
- A couple of test to confirm that the order of -A, -B, -3 etc give
the right number of months.
snprintf(3) doesn't set errno in the tested cases.
- If the same argument reference (for example %1) was specified more than
once, the command didn't necessarily fit to the final command buffer. Fix
this using a dynamic sbuf buffer. Add a few regression tests for the case.
PR: bin/95079
No objections: freebsd-hackers
Do by specifying ".../" with '-m' or MAKESYSPATH (new) environment variable.
Reviewed by: <sjg@NetBSD.org>
Obtained from: NetBSD (+ embellishment by me, sent back to NetBSD)
to wcscoll(3). Newline characters could cause incorrect results when
comparing lines.
Also, if an input line didn't contain a newline character, it was
omitted from the output. According to my interpretation, SUSv3 requires
that the newline is always printed.
Add regression tests for the cases. [1]
PR: bin/140976
Submitted by: D'Arcy Cain (original version) [1]
Approved by: trasz (mentor)
"The escape sequence '\n' shall match a <newline> embedded in
the pattern space."
It is unclear whether this also applies to a \n embedded in a
character class. Disable the existing handling of \n in a character
class following Mac OS X, GNU sed version 4.1.5 with --posix, and
SunOS 5.10 /usr/bin/sed.
Pointed by: Marius Strobl
Obtained from: Mac OS X
of the y (translate) command.
"If a backslash character is immediately followed by a backslash
character in string1 or string2, the two backslash characters shall
be counted as a single literal backslash character"
Pointed by: Marius Strobl
Obtained from: Mac OS X
colliding upper case letters as the lower case letter with a '_' in
front.
MFC after: 3 days
Discussed with: ed
Spotted by: Michael David Crawford <mdc at prgmr.com>
The jot(1) regression tests directory contained two tests named `wx' and
`wX', which doesn't work on case insensitive filesystems. Rename `wX' to
`wX1'.
MFC after: 1 month
"A function can be preceded by one or more '!' characters, in which
case the function shall be applied if the addresses do not select
the pattern space."
each file independently from other files. The new semantics are
desired in the most of practical cases, e.g.: delete lines 5-9
from each file.
Keep the previous semantics of -i under a new option, -I, which
uses a single continuous address space covering all files to edit
in-place -- they are too cool to just drop them.
Add regression tests for -i and -I.
Approved by: dds
Compared with: GNU sed
Discussed on: -hackers
MFC after: 2 weeks
and had no chance to match it by the 2nd address precisely.
Otherwise the unclosed range would bogusly extend to the end
of stream.
Add a basic regression test for the bug fixed. (This change
also fixes the more complex case 5.3 from `multitest.t'.)
Compared with: SUN and GNU seds
Tested by: regression tests
MFC after: 1 week
in a more reasonable way than BSD sed does: they properly
close the range even if we branched over its end. No doubt,
the range `1,5' should not match lines from 9 through 14.
them are related to the `c' function's need to know if we are at
the actual end of the address range. (It must print the text not
earlier than the whole pattern space was deleted.) It appears the
only sed function with this requirement.
There is `lastaddr' set by applies(), which is to notify the `c'
function, but it can't always help because it's false when we are
hitting the end of file early. There is also a bug in applies()
due to which `lastaddr' isn't set to true on degenerate ranges such
as `$,$' or `N,$' if N appears the last line number.
Handling early EOF condition in applies() could look more logical,
but it would effectively revert sed to the unreasonable behaviour
rev. 1.26 of main.c fought against, as it would require lastline()
be called for each line within each address range. So it's better
to call lastline() only if needed by the `c' function.
Together with this change to sed go regression tests for the bugs
fixed (c1-c3). A basic test of `c' (c0) is also added as it helped
me to spot my own error.
Discussed with: dds
Tested by: the regression tests
MFC after: 1 week
I have verified these with GNU sed 4.1.5 (and in some cases with Solaris
sed) and they are identical, with the following exceptions:
5.3: The result is unspecified and BSD sed behaves differently.
6.3: GNU sed gets it wrong
7.1: GNU sed gets it wrong
7.8: BSD sed gets it wrong
