superblock has a check-hash error, an error message noting the
superblock check-hash failure is printed and the mount fails. The
administrator then runs fsck to repair the filesystem and when
successful, the filesystem can once again be mounted.
This approach fails if the filesystem in question is a root filesystem
from which you are trying to boot. Here, the loader fails when trying
to access the filesystem to get the kernel to boot. So it is necessary
to allow the loader to ignore the superblock check-hash error and make
a best effort to read the kernel. The filesystem may be suffiently
corrupted that the read attempt fails, but there is no harm in trying
since the loader makes no attempt to write to the filesystem.
Once the kernel is loaded and starts to run, it attempts to mount its
root filesystem. Once again, failure means that it breaks to its prompt
to ask where to get its root filesystem. Unless you have an alternate
root filesystem, you are stuck.
Since the root filesystem is initially mounted read-only, it is
safe to make an attempt to mount the root filesystem with the failed
superblock check-hash. Thus, when asked to mount a root filesystem
with a failed superblock check-hash, the kernel prints a warning
message that the root filesystem superblock check-hash needs repair,
but notes that it is ignoring the error and proceeding. It does
mark the filesystem as needing an fsck which prevents it from being
enabled for writing until fsck has been run on it. The net effect
is that the reboot fails to single user, but at least at that point
the administrator has the tools at hand to fix the problem.
Reported by: Rick Macklem (rmacklem@)
Discussed with: Warner Losh (imp@)
Sponsored by: Netflix
Specifically reading is done if ffs_sbget() and writing is done
in ffs_sbput(). These functions are exported to libufs via the
sbget() and sbput() functions which then used in the various
filesystem utilities. This work is in preparation for adding
subperblock check hashes.
No functional change intended.
Reviewed by: kib
directories to SUBDIR.${MK_TESTS} idiom
This is being done to pave the way for future work (and homogenity) in
^/projects/make-check-sandbox .
No functional change intended.
MFC after: 1 weeks
The reason is that FreeBSD refcount.h shadows ZFS refcount.h and that
will lead to a build error after a planned import of the ARC buf data
scatter-ization.
It's possible that some day we will have an opposite problem where
a ZFS header would shadow an essential FreeBSD header.
So, we need to think about a better long term solution.
Discussed with: allanjude
MFC after: 17 days
case was the full disk image from the website, which was never
checked in to svn)
Regardless, the testcase still fails
PR: 214908
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Disk image obtained from:
http://www.cfreds.nist.gov/dfr-images/dfr-01-xfat.dd.bz2 -- was ripped off the
first GPT partition and verified to be a FAT-like partition with file(1)/hexdump.
This testcase currently fails
PR: 214908
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
but fstyp cannot detect EL filesystem on EB machine,
so exclude test files from distribution and skip the
test.
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Sponsored by: HEIF5
after r298107
Summary of changes:
- Replace all instances of FILES/TESTS with ${PACKAGE}FILES. This ensures that
namespacing is kept with FILES appropriately, and that this shouldn't need
to be repeated if the namespace changes -- only the definition of PACKAGE
needs to be changed
- Allow PACKAGE to be overridden by callers instead of forcing it to always be
`tests`. In the event we get to the point where things can be split up
enough in the base system, it would make more sense to group the tests
with the blocks they're a part of, e.g. byacc with byacc-tests, etc
- Remove PACKAGE definitions where possible, i.e. where FILES wasn't used
previously.
- Remove unnecessary TESTSPACKAGE definitions; this has been elided into
bsd.tests.mk
- Remove unnecessary BINDIRs used previously with ${PACKAGE}FILES;
${PACKAGE}FILESDIR is now automatically defined in bsd.test.mk.
- Fix installation of files under data/ subdirectories in lib/libc/tests/hash
and lib/libc/tests/net/getaddrinfo
- Remove unnecessary .include <bsd.own.mk>s (some opportunistic cleanup)
Document the proposed changes in share/examples/tests/tests/... via examples
so it's clear that ${PACKAGES}FILES is the suggested way forward in terms of
replacing FILES. share/mk/bsd.README didn't seem like the appropriate method
of communicating that info.
MFC after: never probably
X-MFC with: r298107
PR: 209114
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: buildworld, installworld, checkworld; buildworld, packageworld
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
This is not properly respecting WITHOUT or ARCH dependencies in target/.
Doing so requires a massive effort to rework targets/ to do so. A
better approach will be to either include the SUBDIR Makefiles directly
and map to DIRDEPS or just dynamically lookup the SUBDIR. These lose
the benefit of having a userland/lib, userland/libexec, etc, though and
results in a massive package. The current implementation of targets/ is
very unmaintainable.
Currently rescue/rescue and sys/modules are still not connected.
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
netbsd-tests.test.mk (r289151)
- Eliminate explicit OBJTOP/SRCTOP setting
- Convert all ad hoc NetBSD test integration over to netbsd-tests.test.mk
- Remove unnecessary TESTSDIR setting
- Use SRCTOP where possible for clarity
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Divison
that checksum of vdev label should be checked (which is not done
currently).
No functional change.
While I'm there, raise WARNS to 2.
Reviewed by: allanjude
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3508
characters use the defined constant so that in case of change this
would not break.
Reviewed by: allanjude
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3340
MFC after: 2 weeks
a single space (" ") as a CD9660 label name when no label was present.
Similar problem was also present in msdosfs label recognition.
PR: 200828
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2830
Reviewed by: asomers@, emaste@
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
filesystems. It differs from file(1) in that it gives machine-parseable
output, it outputs filesystem labels, doesn't get confused by other
formats metadata, and runs in Capsicum sandbox.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1255
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
