previously know by StarSemi STR9104.
Tested by the submitter on an Emprex NSD-100 board.
Submitted by: Yohanes Nugroho <yohanes at gmail.com>
Reviewed by: freebsd-arm, stas
Obtained from: //depot/projects/str91xx/...
same ASIC ID of BCM5758 such that r198318 incorecctly enabled TSO
on BCM5754.BCM5754M controllers. BCM5754/BCM5754M needs a special
firmware to enable TSO and bge(4) does not support firmware based
TSO.
Reported by: ed
Tested by: ed
Don't complain when we encounter the "cache" source, it's valid. Also fix
the error message to include a line feed and not include a stray comma.
PR: bin/121671
Submitted by: Artis Caune artis.caune gmail.com
Approved by: ed (mentor)
MFC after: 2 weeks
While here, change "> /dev/stderr" for more usual ">&2"
Submitted by: jilles
was broken w.r.t. byte range lock conflicts when it was the same client
and the request used the open_to_lock_owner4 case, since lckstp->ls_clp
was not set. This patch fixes it by using "clp" instead of "lckstp->ls_clp".
MFC after: 2 weeks
checking for conflicts w.r.t. byte range locks for NFSv4.
1 - Return 0 instead of EACCES when a conflict is found, for F_GETLK.
2 - Check for "same file" when checking for a conflict.
3 - Don't check for a conflict for the F_UNLCK case.
Even though it builds with WARNS=2, some users link sendmail from the
base system against SASL. This doesn't build in this case.
Reported by: Andrzej Tobola <ato iem pw edu pl>
(sblock.fs_magic == FS_UFS1_MAGIC) case, so the check within the
loop is redundant.
Submitted by: Nate Eldredge nge cs.hmc.edu
Reviewed by: mjacob
Approved by: ed (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
the associated debugging under bootverbose.
- Remove freebsd4_sigreturn(); given that FreeBSD 4 didn't supported
sparc64 this only ever served as a transition aid prior to FreeBSD
5.0 and is unused by default since COMPAT_FREEBSD4 was removed from
GENERIC in r143072 nearly 5 years ago.
work.
- Sanity check the parameters passed to the implementations of the
pcib_{read,write}_config() methods. Using illegal values can cause
no real harm but it doesn't hurt to avoid unnecessary data error
traps requiring to flush and re-enable the level 1 caches.
