MTRR handlers are set in {amd64/i686}_mem_drvinit, which is called at
SI_SUB_DRIVERS, and that's too late when EARLY_AP_STARTUP is set because APs
have already started at this point. {amd64/i686}_mrinit is also called too late
for the BSP, since that happens when the memory device is attached, also after
APs have already started.
Move the position to SI_SUB_CPU, and also initialize the state for the BSP, so
that the APs can correctly get to the same state as the BSP.
Sponsored by: Citrix Systems R&D
MFC after: 1 week
Reviewed by: jhb, kib
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9630
sx primitives use inlines as opposed to macros. Change the tested condition
to LOCK_DEBUG which covers the case, but is slightly overzelaous.
Reported by: kib
It is only needed if the LOCK_PROFILING is enabled. It has to always check if
the lock is about to be released which requires an avoidable read if the option
is not specified..
Before this change MaxCmdSN was reported as CmdSN + delta, that made it
limit number of requests in transmission from the initiator to target,
that was pretty useless. After this change MaxCmdSN limits number of
requests queued to CTL, i.e. maximal queue depth for the initiator.
The default limit is 256 outstanding requests per initiator at a time.
This code uses existing cs_outstanding_ctl_pdus counter to track queue
depth. It's semantics doen't perfectly match, but close enough to not
add another counter. Just don't set the maxtags below 2.
MFC after: 2 weeks
They all fallback to the slow path if necessary and the check is there.
This means a panicked kernel executing code from modules will be able to
succeed doing actual lock/unlock, but this was already the case for core code
which has said primitives inlined.
dtrace_trap() consumes page and protection faults triggered by code running
in DTrace probe context. Such faults occur with interrupts disabled and are
detected using a per-CPU flag. Regular faults cause dtrace_trap() to be
called with interrupts enabled, and nothing was ensuring that the flag was
read from the correct CPU. This may result in dtrace_trap() consuming
unrelated page and protection faults when DTrace is enabled, causing the
fault handler to return without actually having handled the fault.
Diagnosed by: Ryan Libby <rlibby@gmail.com>
MFC after: 3 days
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
compile options. Remove doxygen pointers to now deleted files. Remove
EISA and VME as examples in bus_space.9.
Retained EISA mode code for IO PIC and MPTABLES because that's not
EISA bus, per se, and some people have abused EISA to mean "EISA-like
behavior as opposed to ISA" rather than using it for EISA add-in
cards.
Relnotes: yes
VesaLocalBus or EISA. Internally, EISA and ISA are handled the same,
with VL being handled slightly differently. To avoid too much code
churn, retain the EISA name, despite it being used only for ISA
bus. When it is on the ISA bus, weird gymnastics are required with
EISA-space address accesses as well. Remove known models from the ahc
man page. Remove ahc_eisa module.
page. Remove comment about EISA dual channel card. Remove trivial
references in advlib to avoid false positives with grep. Remove stray
MCA reference not worth a seperate commit.
still relevant (ISA cards can still be in EISA mode, and we're still
ignoring those in the identify routine). Notes about cards in EISA
mode have been left in the manual since they aren't relevant to EISA
support, but instruct how to properly configure an ISA card in a mode
when it is in a ISA bus slot.
support. Fix a comment block that's shared with both vx and ep. Remove
obsolete refernce to statically compiling a kernel with a fixed number
of vx devices. Have not removed EISA from the title of the document
the register definitions were originally derived from (though no doubt
more recent docments were also consulted).
Something evidently got mangled in my git tree in between testing and
review, as an old and broken version of the patch was apparently submitted
to svn. Revert this while I work out what went wrong.
Reported by: tuexen
Pointy hat to: rstone
inet_ntoa() cannot be used safely in a multithreaded environment
because it uses a static local buffer. Remove it from the kernel.
Suggested by: glebius, emaste
Reviewed by: gnn
MFC after: never
Sponsored by: Dell EMC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9625
inet_ntoa() cannot be used safely in a multithreaded environment
because it uses a static local buffer. Instead, use inet_ntoa_r()
with a buffer on the caller's stack.
Suggested by: glebius, emaste
Reviewed by: gnn
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Dell EMC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9625
inet_ntoa() cannot be used safely in a multithreaded environment
because it uses a static local buffer. Instead, use inet_ntoa_r()
with a buffer on the caller's stack.
This code had an INET6 conditional before this commit, but opt_inet6.h
was not included, so INET6 was never defined. Apparently, pf's OS
fingerprinting hasn't worked with IPv6 for quite some time.
This commit might fix it, but I didn't test that.
Reviewed by: gnn, kp
MFC after: 2 weeks
Relnotes: yes (if I/someone can test pf OS fingerprinting with IPv6)
Sponsored by: Dell EMC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9625
Somehow in the late stages of testing my sched_ule patch, a character was
accidentally deleted from the file. Correct this.
While I'm committing anyway, the previous commit message requires some
clarification: in the normal case of unlending priority after releasing
a mutex, the thread that was doing the lending will be woken up and
immediately become the highest-priority thread, and in that case no
priority inversion would take place. However, if that thread is pinned
to a different CPU, then the currently running thread that just had its
priority lowered will not be preempted and then priority inversion can
occur.
Reported by: O. Hartmann (typo), jhb (scheduler clarification)
MFC after: 1 month
Pointy hat to: rstone
When a high-priority thread is waiting for a mutex held by a
low-priority thread, it temporarily lends its priority to the
low-priority thread to prevent priority inversion. When the mutex
is released, the lent priority is revoked and the low-priority
thread goes back to its original priority.
When the priority of that thread is lowered (through a call to
sched_priority()), the schedule was not checking whether
there is now a high-priority thread in the run queue. This can
cause threads with real-time priority to be starved in the run
queue while the low-priority thread finishes its quantum.
Fix this by explicitly checking whether preemption is necessary
when a thread's priority is lowered.
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Obtained from: Sandvine Inc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9518
Reviewed by: Jeff Roberson (ule)
MFC after: 1 month
7500 Simplify dbuf_free_range by removing dn_unlisted_l0_blkid
illumos/illumos-gate@653af1b809653af1b809https://www.illumos.org/issues/7500
With the integration of:
commit 0f6d88aded0d165f5954688a9b13bac76c38da84
Author: Alex Reece <alex@delphix.com>
Date: Sat Jul 26 13:40:04 2014 -0800
4873 zvol unmap calls can take a very long time for larger datasets
the dnode's dn_bufs field was changed from a list to a tree. As a result,
the dn_unlisted_l0_blkid field is no longer necessary.
Author: Stephen Blinick <stephen.blinick@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross@gmail.com>
but it allows to use 64 bit linux strace(1) on 64 bit linux binaries.
Reviewed by: dchagin (earlier version)
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9406
Right now this is not critical, but will be after planned increase of
MNAMELEN from 88 to 1k.
Reported and tested by: pho
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
While a new bit was added and thread alignment got shifted to accomodate it,
RW_READERS_SHIFT was not modified accordingly and clashed with the new flag.
This was surprisingly harmless. If the lock was taken for writing, other flags
were tested. If the lock was taken for reading, it would correctly work for
readers > 1 and this was the only relevant test performed.
