Do not DELAY() for P-state transition unless we want to see the result.
Intel manual says: "If a transition is already in progress, transition to
a new value will subsequently take effect. Reads of IA32_PERF_CTL determine
the last targeted operating point." So seems it should be fine to just
trigger wanted transition and go. Linux does the same.
Fix powerd/states on AMD cpus. Resolves issues with system reporting:
hwpstate0: set freq failed, err 6
Tested on FX-8150 and others.
PR: kern/167018
Submitted by: avg@
Approved by: re (gjb)
safer for i386 because it can be easily over 4 GHz now. More worse, it can
be easily changed by user with 'machdep.tsc_freq' tunable (directly) or
cpufreq(4) (indirectly). Note it is intentionally not used in performance
critical paths to avoid performance regression (but we should, in theory).
Alternatively, we may add "virtual TSC" with lower frequency if maximum
frequency overflows 32 bits (and ignore possible incoherency as we do now).
Also, add a comment mentioning _PSD - on some systems it's enough to
put one logical CPU into a particular P-state to make other CPUs in
the same domain to enter that P-state.
Also, call sched_unbind() after the loop - sched_bind() automatically
rebinds from previous CPU to a new one, and the new arrangement of code
is safer against early loop exit.
Plus one minor style nit.
MFC after: 10 days
core lower then set on other cores. Do not try to test P-states on attach
on SMP systems. It is hopeless now and will just pollute verbose logs.
If needed, check still can be forced via loader tunable.
shared and generalized between our current amd64, i386 and pc98.
This is just an initial step that should lead to a more complete effort.
For the moment, a very simple porting of cpufreq modules, BIOS calls and
the whole MD specific ISA bus part is added to the sub-tree but ideally
a lot of code might be added and more shared support should grow.
Sponsored by: Sandvine Incorporated
Reviewed by: emaste, kib, jhb, imp
Discussed on: arch
MFC: 3 weeks
