driver (rev 1.3), by Joerg Sonnenberger.
Note: This change is untested as I do not own the hardware. Let me know
if things work or do not work for you by sending me the output dmesg (and
usbctl -f /dev/usbX if possible). Thanks.
in sta and adhoc modes; this should've been done forever ago as most all
drivers use this hook to set per-station transmit parameters such as for
tx rate control
o adjust drivers to remove explicit calls to the driver newassoc method
might make Qualcomm and Option cards (which have all endpoints in 1
interface) work.
- Change the USB buffer sizes to depend on the transfer speed. With UMTS
we use a buffer 384k / 1000 frames/sec * 50msecs =~ 15kB for example.
- Add a MODULE_VERSION statement
the Sierra and Novatel devices, ignore all umass devices and hide the umass
devices that represent the CD ROM devices (but not the SD card slot in the
Huawei Mobile dongle).
Note: This driver in FBSD7 seems to suffer from memory corruption when used
with an Option GT Quad. The E220 however works flawlessly.
Also add the ID for the Option GTMaxHSUPA, provided by Olivier Fromme.
example the Huawei Mobile has an SD card slot on the second interface.
- Do not attach to Qualcomm and Novatel cards. If ignored these cards will
switch to modem mode automatically it seems.
- Reduce the priority on generic attachment to the appropriate level.
Note: A better solution is to send an eject command straightaway, but that can
be left till later.
This was located in the ubsa driver, but should be moved into a separate
driver:
- 3G modems provide multiple serial ports to allow AT commands while the PPP
connection is up.
- 3G modems do not provide baud rate or other serial port settings.
- Huawei cards need specific initialisation.
- ubsa is for Belkin adapters, an Linuxy choice for another device like 3G.
Speeds achieved here with a weak signal at best is ~40kb/s (UMTS). No spooky
STALLED messages as well.
Next: Move over all entries for Sierra and Novatel cards once I have found
testers, and implemented serial port enumeration for Sierra (or rather have
Andrea Guzzo do it). They list all endpoints in 1 iface instead of 4 ifaces.
Submitted by: aguzzo@anywi.com
MFC after: 3 weeks
After I removed all the unit2minor()/minor2unit() calls from the kernel
yesterday, I realised calling minor() everywhere is quite confusing.
Character devices now only have the ability to store a unit number, not
a minor number. Remove the confusion by using dev2unit() everywhere.
This commit could also be considered as a bug fix. A lot of drivers call
minor(), while they should actually be calling dev2unit(). In -CURRENT
this isn't a problem, but it turns out we never had any problem reports
related to that issue in the past. I suspect not many people connect
more than 256 pieces of the same hardware.
Reviewed by: kib
Kick the device into the right mode if it comes up as a flash-disk.
Set the buffers to a sensible 1024 bytes instead of a far too small
default.
Don't attempt to change speed, baud, parity and such, the device does
not understand it.
this also can be happened if we pull the USN stick out forcibly.
Currently the ZyDAS driver uses tsleep() when it try to query a read
command to the device and it'd make a timeout if the device doesn't
response within about 1 sec.
In a case of that the USB stick is gone by hand and the driver's
scanning with changing the channel numbers, the thread which is sleeping
until a command requested is responded can be waked up after all
detaching routines finished that means the zyd softc already freed.
Tring to touch the softc freed by the wakeup thread makes a panic.
So make sure that all sleeping threads should be waken up before the
detach is completed and any other new requests to the device should be
prevented.
detaching that when the USB is pulled out forcibly during the driver is
running background scan, a page fault can be occurred even if we called
usb_rem_task() when detaching. It looks like a kind of races.
the device indicates that it wasn't able to write all the data in the
buffer out.
Ed Schouten doesn't like the idea of a panic here. I think for
production code, we need something better. For right now, while we're
trying to assess the impact of this issue, a panic is OK. So complain
to me, not him if this is hit.
