sa(4) has some unique behavior that is special-cased in cam_get_device. The
existing tests don't provide coverage for this special case.
Reviewed by: ken
MFC after: 3 weeks
Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13185
* Wrongly matches strings that are shorter than the pattern
* Fails to match negative character sets
* Fails to match character sets that aren't at the end of the pattern
* Fails to match character ranges
Reviewed by: imp
MFC after: 3 weeks
Sponsored by: Spectra Logic Corp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13173
A previous iteration of the tests I added in r319844 involved free(3), but
that attempt didn't pan out, so I switched to stack allocated buffers instead
of heap allocated ones, making the #include unnecessary.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r319844
This change contains several negative and positive tests for:
- cam_open_device
- cam_close_device
- cam_getccb
- cam_freeccb
This also contains a test for the failure case noted in bug 217649,
i.e., O_RDWR must be specified because pass(4) requires it.
This test unfortunately cannot assume that cam-capable devices are
present, so the user must explicitly provide a device via
`test_suites.FreeBSD.cam_test_device`. In the future, a test kernel
module might be shipped, or ctl(4) might be used, as a test device
when testing out libcam, which will allow the tests to do away with
having to specify an explicit test device.
Reviewed by: asomers, ken (earlier diff)
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision: D9928
