I was in two minds as to where to put them in the first case..
I should have listenned to the other mind.
Submitted by: parts by davidxu@
Reviewed by: jeff@ mini@
kernel, you should expect them to do something, so now they do. This
doesn't affect users who don't load or explicitly compile in the
policies.
Approved by: re (jhb)
Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project
Sponsored by: DARPA, Network Associates Laboratories
unused. Replace it with a dm_mount back-pointer to the struct mount
that the devfs_mount is associated with. Export that pointer to MAC
Framework entry points, where all current policies don't use the
pointer. This permits the SEBSD port of SELinux's FLASK/TE to compile
out-of-the-box on 5.0-CURRENT with full file system labeling support.
Approved by: re (murray)
Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project
Sponsored by: DARPA, Network Associates Laboratories
wrong, since we don't want the variable changed, but since we assign
it to variables that may also refer to other non-const strings,
warnings were generated that could break LINT.
Approved by: re
Spotted by: sam
Control) as a MAC Framework policy module. Unlike the existing
src/sys/security/lomac implementation, this one has its fingers out
of the kernel lock order and doesn't make use of flags in existing
kernel structures. This greatly reduces the quantity of replicated
code with src/sys/kern, simplifies the implementation (3000 vs 8500
lines), and correctes a number of known stability problems with
the existing LOMAC implementation, which will be removed. A bit
more hooking up to do here.
Approved by: re
Obtained from: TrustedBSD Project
Sponsored by: DARPA, Network Associates Laboratories
