This test should no longer provoke large amounts of traffic, which can
overwhelm single-core systems, preventing them from making progress in the
tests.
The test can now be re-enabled.
PR: 246448
Enable STP before bringing the bridges up. This avoids a switching loop,
which has a tendency to drown out progress in userspace processes,
especially on single-core systems.
Only check that we have indeed shut down one of the looped interfaces
PR: 246448
Reviewed by: melifaro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25084
Fix the netinet/netinet6 divert tests falsely reporting 'ipdivert module is
not loaded' when the divert module is built into the kernel
Sponsored by: Axiado
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25026
This patch fixes two issues relating to FUSE_ACCESS when the
default_permissions mount option is disabled:
* VOP_ACCESS() calls with VADMIN set should never be sent to a fuse server
in the form of FUSE_ACCESS operations. The FUSE protocol has no equivalent
of VADMIN, so we must evaluate such things kernel-side, regardless of the
default_permissions setting.
* The FUSE protocol only requires FUSE_ACCESS to be sent for two purposes:
for the access(2) syscall and to check directory permissions for
searchability during lookup. FreeBSD sends it much more frequently, due to
differences between our VFS and Linux's, for which FUSE was designed. But
this patch does eliminate several cases not required by the FUSE protocol:
* for any FUSE_*XATTR operation
* when creating a new file
* when deleting a file
* when setting timestamps, such as by utimensat(2).
* Additionally, when default_permissions is disabled, this patch removes one
FUSE_GETATTR operation when deleting a file.
PR: 245689
Reported by: MooseFS FreeBSD Team <freebsd@moosefs.pro>
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24777
When a FUSE operation other than LOOKUP returns ENOENT, the kernel will
reclaim that vnode, resuling in a FUSE_FORGET being sent a short while
later. Many of the ENOENT tests weren't expecting those FUSE_FORGET
operations. They usually passed by luck since FUSE_FORGET is often delayed.
This commit adds appropriate expectations.
MFC after: 2 weeks
common_init_tbl is only used within this single CU, so it should be marked
static.
WARNS=6 also complained about the var defined by
`ATF_TC_WITH_CLEANUP(getastats);` being unused, which turns out to be
because it's not been hooked up in ATF_TP_ADD_TCS. kp@ did not immediately
recall any reason for this, and the case passes on my local system, so hook
it up.
Note that I've not yet set WARNS= 6 here. Investigation is underway to see
if we can feasibly default WARNS to 6 for src builds to catch directories
too deep to inherit a WARNS from the top-level subdirectories' Makefile.inc.
Those particular WARNS settings will be subsequently removed as they become
redundant with a more-global default.
MFC after: 1 week
The test makefiles will handle setting mode bits during install. Also,
Phabricator gets upset when uploading an executable plain-text file
without a shebang.
MFC after: 1 week
These two errors have been present since the tests' introduction.
Coincidentally every test (I think there's only one) that cares about that
field also works when the field's value is 0.
MFC after: 2 weeks
This test uses a gnop feature (delay probability) that isn't available on
stable/12. But it's unnecessary; the test works fine without it. Removing
it simplifies the test and, once MFCed, will allow it to pass on stable/12.
PR: 244158
Reported by: lwhsu
MFC after: 2 weeks
mac_bsdextended(4), when enabled, causes ordinary operations to send many
more VOP_GETATTRs to file system. The fusefs tests expectations aren't
written with those in mind. Optionally expecting them would greatly
obfuscate the fusefs tests. Worse, certain fusefs functionality (like
attribute caching) would be impossible to test if the tests couldn't expect
an exact number of GETATTR operations.
This commit resolves that conflict by making two changes:
1. The fusefs tests will now check for mac_bsdextended, and skip if it's
enabled.
2. The mac_bsdextended tests will now check whether the module is enabled, not
merely loaded. If it's loaded but disabled, the tests will automatically
enable it for the duration of the tests.
With these changes, a CI system can achieve best coverage by loading both
fusefs and mac_bsdextended at boot, and setting
security.mac.bsdextended.enabled=0
PR: 244229
Reported by: lwhsu
Reviewed by: cem
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24577
This removes support for the following algorithms:
- ARC4
- Blowfish
- CAST128
- DES
- 3DES
- MD5-HMAC
- Skipjack
Since /dev/crypto no longer supports 3DES, stop testing the 3DES KAT
vectors in cryptotest.py.
Reviewed by: cem (previous version)
Relnotes: yes
Sponsored by: Chelsio Communications
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24346
We used to have an issue with recursive locking with
net.link.bridge.inherit_mac. This causes us to send an ARP request while
we hold the BRIDGE_LOCK, which used to cause us to acquire the
BRIDGE_LOCK again. We can't re-acquire it, so this caused a panic.
Now that we no longer need to acquire the BRIDGE_LOCK for
bridge_transmit() this should no longer panic. Test this.
PR: 216510
Reviewed by: emaste, philip
MFC after: 2 months
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24251
The new tests have more complete setup and cleanup, are more granular, and
correctly annotate expected failures and skipped tests. A follow-up commit
will resolve a conflict with the fusefs tests (bug 244229).
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24257
- Lookup device drivers to test by name instead of assuming that the
software / hardware flags will select specific drivers.
- Set the sysctl to permit software /dev/crypto requests when testing
the accelerated software blake2 driver.
PR: 245825
Reported by: lwhsu
Reviewed by: cem, lwhsu
Sponsored by: Chelsio Communications
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D24540
There were ultimately two separate problems here:
- a 32-bit long cannot represent microseconds since 1970 (noted by ian)
- time_t is 32-bit on i386, so now() was wrong anyways even with the correct
return type.
For the first, just explicitly use a uint64_t for now() and all of the
callers. For the second, we need to explicitly cast tv_sec to uint64_t
before it gets multiplied in the SEC_TO_US macro. Casting this instance
rather than generally in the macro was arbitrarily chosen simply because all
other uses are converting small relative time values.
The tests now pass on i386, at least; presumably other ILP32 will be fine
now as well.
We used to have a problem where bridges created in different vnet jails
would end up having the same mac address. This is now fixed by
including the jail name as a seed for the mac address generation, but we
should verify that it doesn't regress.
Originally noticed while attempting to run the kqueue tests under
qemu-user-static, this apparently just happens sometimes when running in a
jail in general -- the timer will fire off "too early," but it's really just
the result of imprecise measurements (noted by cem).
Kicking this over to NOTE_USECONDS still tests the correct thing while
allowing it to work more consistently; a basic sanity test reveals that we
often end up coming in just less than 200 microseconds after the timer
fired off.
MFC after: 3 days
closefrom has been converted to close_range internally; remediation is
underway for this, marking it as an expected fail for now while proper
course is determined.
PR: 245625
Similar to mmap'ing vnodes, posixshm should count any mapping where maxprot
contains VM_PROT_WRITE (i.e. fd opened r/w with no write-seal applied) as
writable and thus blocking of any write-seal.
The memfd tests have been amended to reflect the fixes here, which notably
includes:
1. Fix for error return bug; EPERM is not a documented failure mode for mmap
2. Fix rejection of write-seal with active mappings that can be upgraded via
mprotect(2).
Reported by: markj
Discussed with: markj, kib
