space available for chunks. This unbreaks the handling of
ICMPV6 packets indicating "packet too big". It just worked
for IPv4 since we are overbooking for IPv4.
MFC after: 1 week
This made a couple of bugs visible in handling SSN wrap-arounds
when using DATA chunks. Now bulk transfer seems to work fine...
This fixes the issue reported in
https://github.com/sctplab/usrsctp/issues/111
MFC after: 1 week
The tools using to generate the sources has been updated and produces
different whitespaces. Commit this seperately to avoid intermixing
these with real code changes.
MFC after: 3 days
specific order. VNET_SYSUNINITs however are doing exactly that.
Thus remove the VIMAGE conditional field from the domain(9) protosw
structure and replace it with VNET_SYSUNINITs.
This also allows us to change some order and to make the teardown functions
file local static.
Also convert divert(4) as it uses the same mechanism ip(4) and ip6(4) use
internally.
Slightly reshuffle the SI_SUB_* fields in kernel.h and add a new ones, e.g.,
for pfil consumers (firewalls), partially for this commit and for others
to come.
Reviewed by: gnn, tuexen (sctp), jhb (kernel.h)
Obtained from: projects/vnet
MFC after: 2 weeks
X-MFC: do not remove pr_destroy
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6652
chunk, enable UDP encapsulation for all those addresses.
This helps clients using a userland stack to support multihoming if
they are not behind a NAT.
MFC after: 1 week
containing an INIT chunk. These need to be handled in case the peer
does not support SCTP and returns an ICMP messages indicating destination
unreachable, protocol unreachable.
MFC after: 1 week
is required to check the verification tag. However, this
requires the verification tag to be not 0. Enforce this.
For packets with a verification tag of 0, we need to
check it it contains an INIT chunk and use the initiate
tag for the validation. This will be a separate commit,
since it touches also other code.
MFC after: 1 week
adds the new I-Data (Interleaved Data) message. This allows a user
to be able to have complete freedom from Head Of Line blocking that
was previously there due to the in-ability to send multiple large
messages without the TSN's being in sequence. The code as been
tested with Michaels various packet drill scripts as well as
inter-networking between the IETF's location in Argentina and Germany.
* When processing a cookie, use the number of
streams announced in the INIT-ACK.
* When sending an INIT-ACK for an existing
association, use the value from the association,
not from the end-point.
MFC after: 1 week
1) We were not handling (or sending) the IN_PROGRESS case if
the other side (or our side) was not able to reset (awaiting more data).
2) We would improperly send a stream-reset when we should not. Not
waiting until the TSN had been assigned when data was inqueue.
Reviewed by: tuexen
We would like to acknowledge Clement LECIGNE from Google Security Team and
Francisco Falcon from Core Security Technologies who discovered the issue
independently and reported to the FreeBSD Security Team.
Security: FreeBSD-SA-15:02.kmem
Security: CVE-2014-8612
Submitted by: tuexen
