since the source name is not the same as the texinfo name so we have to
use SRCS=. This means we can't build two info sets in the same directory
so I've split it.
so many). For now, the only extended attribute implemented is NO ECHO,
useful for things like passwords. See TESTS/input2.c for an example.
This should go into 2.2.
We've already got it in libc, but both libraries are incompatible
wrt. their header files and internal data structures. This
incompatibility caused the expr(1) on the fixit floppy to mysteriously
dump core for the colon operator.
Strong 2.2 candidate, since it fixes the usage of MAKEDEV on the fixit
floppy. I'd like to get it reviewed by somebody else though.
Observed by: andreas
This closes PR#1975 and was on my TODO list, so I'm breaking my own "no more
commits before I fly!" rule and taking care of this, since it was at the
very top and Peter shamed me in to taking care of it. This is definitely
a 2.2 candidate.
Submitted-By: Mark Diekhans <markd@Grizzly.COM>
testing I changed it to -c to check for missed files by looking at time
stamps in /usr/include/g++.
Submitted by: "Philippe Charnier" <charnier@xp11.frmug.org>
(it was directly underneath where bool.h used to be in the list, I think
I must have not been paying attention and deleted a word from the wrong
line. The machine that I was testing on still had an (old?) osfcn.h file)
Pointed out by: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
a (now) defunct routine that no longer exists (causing an empty .o file),
and were missing some others. Some of the ones we were missing are no-ops
on the i386, so there are now 4 empty .o files.
(It seems that libc/quad has got some defunct functions now)
(the old cc has been tagged with "gcc_2_6_3_final" so we have a reference
point in case of unforseen disasters...)
This has the objc backend active, and I think I've managed to get the
f77 f2c support through in one piece, but I don't know fortran to test it.
A 'make world' change and libobjc commit will follow.
If you normally do 'make -DNOCLEAN world', do not do so this time, I know
it can fail with groff.
This version of gcc makes a **LOT** more warnings on our kernel.
