It causes a panic when/if snd_una is incremented elsewhere (this
is a conservative change, because originally no rollback occurred
for any packets at all).
Submitted by: Vivek Sadananda Pai <vivek@imimic.com>
Update copyrights.
Introduce a new sysctl node:
net.inet.accf
Although acceptfilters need refcounting to be properly (safely) unloaded
as a temporary hack allow them to be unloaded if the sysctl
net.inet.accf.unloadable is set, this is really for developers who want
to work on thier own filters.
A near complete re-write of the accf_http filter:
1) Parse check if the request is HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1 if not dump
to the application.
Because of the performance implications of this there is a sysctl
'net.inet.accf.http.parsehttpversion' that when set to non-zero
parses the HTTP version.
The default is to parse the version.
2) Check if a socket has filled and dump to the listener
3) optimize the way that mbuf boundries are handled using some voodoo
4) even though you'd expect accept filters to only be used on TCP
connections that don't use m_nextpkt I've fixed the accept filter
for socket connections that use this.
This rewrite of accf_http should allow someone to use them and maintain
full HTTP compliance as long as net.inet.accf.http.parsehttpversion is
set.
for them does not belong in the IP_FW_F_COMMAND switch, that mask doesn't even
apply to them(!).
2. You cannot add a uid/gid rule to something that isn't TCP, UDP, or IP.
XXX - this should be handled in ipfw(8) as well (for more diagnostic output),
but this at least protects bogus rules from being added.
Pointy hat: green
datagram embedded into ICMP error message, not with protocol
field of ICMP message itself (which is always IPPROTO_ICMP).
Pointed by: Erik Salander <erik@whistle.com>
fields between host and network byte order. The details:
o icmp_error() now does not add IP header length. This fixes the problem
when icmp_error() is called from ip_forward(). In this case the ip_len
of the original IP datagram returned with ICMP error was wrong.
o icmp_error() expects all three fields, ip_len, ip_id and ip_off in host
byte order, so DTRT and convert these fields back to network byte order
before sending a message. This fixes the problem described in PR 16240
and PR 20877 (ip_id field was returned in host byte order).
o ip_ttl decrement operation in ip_forward() was moved down to make sure
that it does not corrupt the copy of original IP datagram passed later
to icmp_error().
o A copy of original IP datagram in ip_forward() was made a read-write,
independent copy. This fixes the problem I first reported to Garrett
Wollman and Bill Fenner and later put in audit trail of PR 16240:
ip_output() (not always) converts fields of original datagram to network
byte order, but because copy (mcopy) and its original (m) most likely
share the same mbuf cluster, ip_output()'s manipulations on original
also corrupted the copy.
o ip_output() now expects all three fields, ip_len, ip_off and (what is
significant) ip_id in host byte order. It was a headache for years that
ip_id was handled differently. The only compatibility issue here is the
raw IP socket interface with IP_HDRINCL socket option set and a non-zero
ip_id field, but ip.4 manual page was unclear on whether in this case
ip_id field should be in host or network byte order.
not alias `ip_src' unless it comes from the host an original
datagram that triggered this error message was destined for.
PR: 20712
Reviewed by: brian, Charles Mott <cmott@scientech.com>
When this happens, we know for sure that the packet data was not
received by the peer. Therefore, back out any advancing of the
transmit sequence number so that we send the same data the next
time we transmit a packet, avoiding a guaranteed missed packet and
its resulting TCP transmit slowdown.
In most systems ip_output() probably never returns an error, and
so this problem is never seen. However, it is more likely to occur
with device drivers having short output queues (causing ENOBUFS to
be returned when they are full), not to mention low memory situations.
Moreover, because of this problem writers of slow devices were
required to make an unfortunate choice between (a) having a relatively
short output queue (with low latency but low TCP bandwidth because
of this problem) or (b) a long output queue (with high latency and
high TCP bandwidth). In my particular application (ISDN) it took
an output queue equal to ~5 seconds of transmission to avoid ENOBUFS.
A more reasonable output queue of 0.5 seconds resulted in only about
50% TCP throughput. With this patch full throughput was restored in
the latter case.
Reviewed by: freebsd-net
delete the cloned route that is associated with the connection.
This does not exhaust the routing table memory when the system
is under a SYN flood attack. The route entry is not deleted if there
is any prior information cached in it.
Reviewed by: Peter Wemm,asmodai
reply if the requesting machine isn't on the interface we believe
it should be. Prevents arp wars when you plug cables in the wrong
way around.
PR: 9848
Submitted by: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
Not objected to by: wollman
- Multiple PPTP clients behind NAT to the same or different servers.
- Single PPTP server behind NAT -- you just need to redirect TCP
port 1723 to a local machine. Multiple servers behind NAT is
possible but would require a simple API change.
- No API changes!
For more information on how this works see comments at the start of
the alias_pptp.c.
PacketAliasPptp() is no longer necessary and will be removed soon.
Submitted by: Erik Salander <erik@whistle.com>
Reviewed by: ru
Rewritten by: ru
Reviewed by: Erik Salander <erik@whistle.com>
accept filters are now loadable as well as able to be compiled into
the kernel.
two accept filters are provided, one that returns sockets when data
arrives the other when an http request is completed (doesn't work
with 0.9 requests)
Reviewed by: jmg
It does mean that it is now possible to run passive-mode FTP
server behind NAT.
- SECURITY: FTP aliasing engine now ensures that:
o the segment preceding a PORT/227 segment terminates with a \r\n;
o the IP address in the PORT/227 matches the source IP address of
the packet;
o the port number in the PORT command or 277 reply is greater than
or equal to 1024.
Submitted by: Erik Salander <erik@whistle.com>
Reviewed by: ru
It also squashes 99% of packet kiddie synflood orgies. For example, to
rate syn packets without MSS,
ipfw pipe 10 config 56Kbit/s queue 10Packets
ipfw add pipe 10 tcp from any to any in setup tcpoptions !mss
Submitted by: Richard A. Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
