It is assembled using "${CC} -x assembler-with-cpp", which by convention
(bsd.suffixes.mk) uses the .asm extension.
This is a portion of the review referenced below (D18344). That review
also renamed linux_support.s to .S, but that is a functional change
(using the compiler's integrated assembler instead of as) and will be
revisited separately.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18344
syscalls.conf is included using "." which per the Open Group:
If file does not contain a <slash>, the shell shall use the search
path specified by PATH to find the directory containing file.
POSIX shells don't fall back to the current working directory.
Submitted by: Nathaniel Wesley Filardo <nwf20@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Reviewed by: bdrewery
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20476
of them listed in opt_global.h which is not generated while building
modules outside of a kernel and such modules never match real cofigured
kernel.
So, we should prevent our users from building obviously defective modules.
Therefore, remove the root cause of the building of modules outside of a
kernel - the possibility of building modules with DEBUG or KTR flags.
And remove all of DEBUG printfs as it is incomplete and in threaded
programms not informative, also a half of system call does not have DEBUG
printf. For debuging Linux programms we have dtrace, ktr and ktrace ability.
PR: 222861
Reviewed by: trasz
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20178
Equivalent to r339958 for sys/kern/syscalls.master.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14858
move bits that are MI out into the headers in compat/linux.
For that remove bogus _packed attribute from struct l_sockaddr
and use MI types for struct members.
And continue to move into the linux_common module a code that is
intended for both Linuxulator modules (both instruction set - 32 & 64 bit)
or for external modules like linsysfs or linprocfs.
To avoid header pollution introduce new sys/compat/linux_common.h header.
Reviewed by: emaste
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20137
In all of the architectures we have today, we always use PAGE_SIZE.
While in theory one could define different things, none of the
current architectures do, even the ones that have transitioned from
32-bit to 64-bit like i386 and arm. Some ancient mips binaries on
other systems used 8k instead of 4k, but we don't support running
those and likely never will due to their age and obscurity.
Reviewed by: imp (who also contributed the commit message)
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19280
Linux/arm64 is CLONE_BACKWARDS - i.e., "Architecture has tls passed as
the 4th argument of clone(2), not the 5th one."
The linux clone() syscall has four different permutations of argument
order, depending on architecture - see the #ifdef CONFIG_CLONE_BACKWARDS
maze in Linux's kernel/fork.c.
Sponsored by: Turing Robotic Industries
This needs to be revisited with the VDSO implementation, but is
sufficient to allow the linux64 module to build on arm64 for testing
and development.
Sponsored by: Turing Robotic Industries
the Linuxulator. We need to translate error values onto Linux errno values
and return them to userspace when a syscall fails. We also need to preserve
x1 as all registers are preserved other than the return value.
Reviewed by: emaste
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16008
This is sufficient to run Linux arm64 'hello world' and other simple
binaries.
Reviewed by: andrew
Sponsored by: Turing Robotic Industries
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15834
This provides stub implementations of arm64 Linux vdso and machdep,
ptrace, and futex sufficient for executing an arm64 Linux 'hello world'
binary.
Reviewed by: andrew
Sponsored by: Turing Robotic Industries
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15832
This is the first step (after the recent refactoring of some common
code) to supporting the Linuxulator on arm64.
Reviewed by: andrew
Sponsored by: Turing Robotic Industries Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15187
