intelligent enough to take default section and entry names
for the purpose of being able to use it on old texinfo files
in the source tree. This involved very minor modifications and
the new options --defsection and --defentry which behave just like
--section and --entry but ignore their argument if the info file
is annotated with the information. This change should only be
neccesary as long as there are old-style texinfo source in the tree.
Kernel Interfaces Manual
This was needed because of a few man pages like keyboard(4)
which caused the header to become unreadable with the longer
description.
This has some (all?) of the DNSSEC key management/distribution mechanism
in place. (The SIG and KEY RR's)
Obtained from: Paul Vixie / ISC / ftp.isc.org
this will make it less likely to misinterpret arrow keys as seperate
keys when running over anything slower than a console.
This has been talked about for a while, I hope it's long enough but not
too long to be annoying.
do it themselves. (Some of these programs actually depended on this
beyond compiling the definition of struct ifinfo!) Also fix up some
other #include messes while we're at it.
as performed by the multicast kernel modifications. However, BSD
already had IPPROTO_ENCAP defined as 98 (RFC 1241 encapsulation).
This changes the use of IPPROTO_ENCAP to IPPROTO_IPIP, which is
the BSD name for IP proto 4.
fully registered.
(This is the second try, the first import ignored .info files but not .info-*
files, for some reason. I'm going to make this consistent.)
Reviewed by: core
Approved for: 2.2
Without this, compiled programs die with FP errors.
This is originally credited to: jlemon@netcom.com (Jonathan Lemon), and
has been forwarded to me by quite a few of people.
(implemented better, admittedly) with a new option, '-S'. If the
maintainers of traceroute (Van?) add a -S option, we will then be in
conflict.
Also added a too-brief description of the option in the man page. Someone
with a better command of English than I at the moment should probably look
over it and rephrase it.
Reviewed by: pst, jkh
