the file associated with the given file descriptor.
Reviewed by: kib, asomers
Reviewed by: cem, jilles, brooks (they reviewed previous version)
Discussed with: pjd, and many others
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14567
There are a few places that use hand crafted versions of the macros
from sys/netinet/in.h making it difficult to actually alter the
values in use by these macros. Correct that by replacing handcrafted
code with proper macro usage.
Reviewed by: karels, kristof
Approved by: bde (mentor)
MFC after: 3 weeks
Sponsored by: John Gilmore
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19317
The current logic for CSTD/CXXSTD requires homogenity as far as the
supported C/C++ standards, which is a sensible default. However, when
dealing with differing versions of C++, some code may compile with C++11, but
not C++17 (for instance). So in order to avoid having people convert over their
code to the new standard, give the users the ability to specify the standard on
a per-program basis.
This will allow a user to override the supporting standard for a set of
programs, mixing C++11 with C++14 (for instance).
Reviewed by: asomers
Apprved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345708
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19738
When a review is closed via Phabricator it updates the patch attached to the
review. I downloaded the raw patch from Phabricator, applied it, and repeated
my mistake from r345704 by accident mixing content from D19732 and D19738.
For my own personal sanity, I will try not to mix reviews like this in the
future.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345706
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
CXXSTD was added as the C++ analogue to CSTD.
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r345203, r345704, r345705
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: make tinderbox
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
I accidentally committed code from two reviews. I will reintroduce the code to
bsd.progs.mk as part of a separate commit from r345704.
Approved by: emaste (mentor, implicit)
MFC after: 2 months
MFC with: r345704
CXXSTD defaults to `-std=c++11` with supporting compilers; `-std=gnu++98`,
otherwise for older versions of g++.
This change standardizes the CXXSTD variable, originally added to
googletest.test.inc.mk as part of r345203.
As part of this effort, convert all `CXXFLAGS+= -std=*` calls to use `CXXSTD`.
Notes:
This value is not sanity checked in bsd.sys.mk, however, given the two
most used C++ compilers on FreeBSD (clang++ and g++) support both modes, it is
likely to work with both toolchains. This method will be refined in the future
to support more variants of C++, as not all versions of clang++ and g++ (for
instance) support C++14, C++17, etc.
Any manual appending of `-std=*` to `CXXFLAGS` should be replaced with CXXSTD.
Example:
Before this commit:
```
CXXFLAGS+= -std=c++14
```
After this commit:
```
CXXSTD= c++14
```
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 month
Relnotes: yes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19732
If dso uses initial exec TLS mode, rtld tries to allocate TLS in
static space. If there is no space left, the dlopen(3) fails. If space
if allocated, initial content from PT_TLS segment is distributed to
all threads' pcbs, which was missed and caused un-initialized TLS
segment for such dso after dlopen(3).
The mode is auto-detected either due to the relocation used, or if the
DF_STATIC_TLS dynamic flag is set. In the later case, the TLS segment
is tried to allocate earlier, which increases chance of the dlopen(3)
to succeed. LLD was recently fixed to properly emit the flag, ld.bdf
did it always.
Initial test by: dumbbell
Tested by: emaste (amd64), ian (arm)
Tested by: Gerald Aryeetey <aryeeteygerald_rogers.com> (arm64)
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19072
r345620 by kib@ fixed the rtld issue that caused a crash at startup
during resolution of libc's ifuncs with BIND_NOW.
PR: 233333
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
r343532 noted the difference between "hw.realmem" and "hw.physmem", which I
was previously unaware of. I discovered that neither sysctl had a
description visible via `sysctl -d', so I found where they were defined and
added suitable descriptions. While in the file, I went ahead and added
descriptions for all the others which lacked them. I also updated sysctl.3
accordingly
Reviewed by: kib, bcr
MFC after: 1 weeks
Sponsored by: Panasas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19007
According to 0mp, macros are not expanded in the argument provided to
-width. Use plain identifiers for width specification.
Noted and reviewed by: 0mp
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 3 days
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19308
In short, the prior code was far too simplistic when it came to calling recv(2)
and failed intermittently (or in the case of Jenkins, deterministically).
Handle short recv(2)s by checking the return code and incrementing the window
into the buffer by the number of received bytes. If the number of received
bytes <= 0, then bail out of the loop, and test the total number of received
bytes vs the expected number of bytes sent for equality, and base whether or
not the test passes/fails on that fact.
Remove the expected failure, now that the hdtr testcases deterministically pass
on my host after this change [1].
PR: 234809 [1], 235200
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19188
This was discovered through examination -- acl_copy_entry() copies the
tag type and permset fields.
Reviewed by: trasz, pfg
Sponsored by: iXsystems Inc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19240
back to the lever before r343030. For 64-bit machines reduce it slightly,
too. Together with r343030 I bumped the limit up to the value we use at
Netflix to serve 100 Gbit/s of sendfile traffic, and it probably isn't a
good default.
Provide a loader tunable to change vnode pager pbufs count. Document it.
In particular, use ifuncs for __getcontextx_size(), also calculate the
size of the extended save area in resolver. Same for __fillcontextx2().
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
Back in 1993, the fgetln (then fgetline) interface was changed to not
return a C string. The change was accomplished by ifdefing out the code
that did the termination. Changing the interface would violate our API
stability rules so remove the old implementation.
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
This optimizes out runtime switch and removes yet another cpuid from
libc.
Note that this is the first use of ifunc in i386 libc, so
ifunc-capable toolchain is required for building runnable userspace on
i386, same as on amd64.
Discussed with: emaste
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
ci.FreeBSD.org does not have access to a DNS resolver/network (unlike my test
VM), so in order for the test to pass on the host, it needs to avoid the DNS
lookup by using the numeric host address representation.
PR: 235200
Reviewed by: asomers, lwhsu
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
MFC after: 2 weeks
MFC with: r343362, r343365, r343367-r343368, r343461
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19026
The return value (`err`) should be checked; not the `errno` value.
PR: 235200
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
Reviewed by: asomers, lwhsu
MFC after: 28 days
MFC with: r343362, r343365, r343367-r343368
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18969
This is meant to clarify the fact that the system call will not fail
with -1/EFAULT, as one might expect, when reading the sendfile(2)
manpage today.
While here, pet the mandoc linter, when dealing with the section that
describes valid values for `flags`.
PR: 232210
MFC after: 2 weeks
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
Reviewed by: glebius, 0mp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18949
I should have only changed the format qualifier with the `size_t` value,
`length`, not the other [`off_t`] value, `dest_file_size`.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r343362, r343365, r343367
Approved by: emaste (mentor; implicit)
Reported by: gcc 8.x
gcc 8.x is more pedantic than clang 7.x with format strings and the tests
passed `void*` variables while supplying `%s` (which is technically
incorrect).
Make the affected `void*` variables use `char*` storage instead to address
this issue, as the compiler will upcast the values to `char*`.
MFC after: 1 month
MFC with: r343362
Approved by: emaste (mentor; implicit)
Reviewed by: asomers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18934
These testcases exercise a number of functional requirements for sendfile(2).
The testcases use IPv4 and IPv6 domain sockets with TCP, and were confirmed
functional on UFS and ZFS. UDP address family sockets cannot be used per the
sendfile(2) contract, thus using UDP sockets is outside the scope of
testing the syscall in positive cases. As seen in
`:s_negative_udp_socket_test`, UDP is used to test the sendfile(2) contract
to ensure that EINVAL is returned by sendfile(2).
The testcases added explicitly avoid testing out `SF_SYNC` due to the
complexity of verifying that support. However, this is a good next logical
item to verify.
The `hdtr_positive*` testcases work to a certain degree (the header
testcases pass), but the trailer testcases do not work (it is an expected
failure). In particular, the value received by the mock server doesn't match
the expected value, and instead looks something like the following (using
python array notation):
`trailer[:]message[1:]`
instead of:
`message[:]trailer[:]`
This makes me think there's a buffer overrun issue or problem with the
offset somewhere in the sendfile(2) system call, but I need to do some
other testing first to verify that the code is indeed sane, and my
assumptions/code isn't buggy.
The `sbytes_negative` testcases that check `sbytes` being set to an
invalid value resulting in `EFAULT` fails today as the other change
(which checks `copyout(9)`) has not been committed [1]. Thus, it
should remain an expected failure (see bug 232210 for more details
on this item).
Next steps for testing sendfile(2):
1. Fix the header/trailer testcases so that they pass.
2. Setup if_tap interface and test with it, instead of using "localhost", per
@asomers's suggestion.
3. Handle short recv(2)'s in `server_cat(..)`.
4. Add `SF_SYNC` support.
5. Add some more negative tests outside the scope of the functional contract.
MFC after: 1 month
Reviewed by: asomers
Approved by: emaste (mentor)
PR: 232210
Sponsored by: Netflix, Inc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18625
An integrity check such as a check-hash or a cross-correlation failed.
The integrity error falls between EINVAL that identifies errors in
parameters to a system call and EIO that identifies errors with the
underlying storage media. EINTEGRITY is typically raised by intermediate
kernel layers such as a filesystem or an in-kernel GEOM subsystem when
they detect inconsistencies. Uses include allowing the mount(8) command
to return a different exit value to automate the running of fsck(8)
during a system boot.
These changes make no use of the new error, they just add it. Later
commits will be made for the use of the new error number and it will
be added to additional manual pages as appropriate.
Reviewed by: gnn, dim, brueffer, imp
Discussed with: kib, cem, emaste, ed, jilles
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18765
Based on the description in Linux man page.
Reviewed by: markj, ngie (previous version)
Sponsored by: Mellanox Technologies
MFC after: 1 week
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18837
from the local mapping.
Enable the setting by default.
The article behind the change: https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.01161
Reviewed by: markj
Discussed with: emaste
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
Differential revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18764
As it does for recv*(2), MSG_DONTWAIT indicates that the call should
not block, returning EAGAIN instead. Linux and OpenBSD both implement
this, so the change makes porting easier, especially since we do not
return EINVAL or so when unrecognized flags are specified.
Submitted by: Greg V <greg@unrelenting.technology>
Reviewed by: tuexen
MFC after: 1 week
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18728
When presented with an arg string like '-l-', getopt_long will successfully
parse out the 'l' short option, then proceed to match '--' against the first
longopts entry as it later does a strncmp with len=0. This latter bit is
arguably another bug in itself, but presumably not a practical issue as all
callers of parse_long_options are already doing the right thing (except this
one pointed out).
An opt string like '-l-' should be considered malformed and throw a bad
argument rather than behaving as if '--' were passed. It cannot possibly do
what the invoker expects, and it's probably the result of a typo (ls -l- a)
rather than any intent.
Reported by: Tony Overfield <toverfield@yahoo.com>
Reviewed by: imp
MFC after: 2 weeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18616
Add a short description of the function to the appropriate man page and add
reference to it where it makes sense.
Reviewed by: bcr, markj, 0mp
Approved by: markj
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18725
