so the annoying message is not printed.
o Don't warn about FUTEX_FD not being implemented
and return ENOSYS instead of 0 (eg. success).
o Clear FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG as we actually implement
only private futexes so there is no reason to
return ENOSYS when app asks for a private futex.
We don't reject shared futexes because they worked
just fine with our implementation so far.
Approved by: kib (mentor)
Tested by: bsam
MFC after: 1 week
Implement all futex atomic operations in assembler to not depend on the
fuword() that does not allow to distinguish between -1 and failure return.
Correctly return 0 from atomic operations on success.
In collaboration with: rdivacky
Tested by: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel gmail com>, Milos Vyletel <mvyletel mzm cz>
Sponsored by: Google SoC 2007
semi-automatic style(9)
The futex stuff already differs a lot (only a small part does not differ)
from NetBSD, so we are already way off and can't apply changes from NetBSD
automatically. As we need to merge everything by hand already, we can even
make the files comply to our world order.
Please don't style(9) the NetBSD code, we want to stay in sync. Not imported
on a vendor branch since we need local changes.
Sponsored by: Google SoC 2006
Submitted by: rdivacky
With help from: manu@NetBSD.org
Obtained from: NetBSD (linux_{futex,time}.*)
