The function name expandstr() and the general idea of doing this kind of
expansion by treating the text as a here document without end marker is from
dash.
All variants of parameter expansion and arithmetic expansion also work (the
latter is not required by POSIX but it does not take extra code and many
other shells also allow it).
Command substitution is prevented because I think it causes too much code to
be re-entered (for example creating an unbounded recursion of trace lines).
Unfortunately, our LINENO is somewhat crude, otherwise PS4='$LINENO+ ' would
be quite useful.
If the here-document is attached to a compound command or subshell, $?
already works properly. This is both a workaround for bin/41410 and a
requirement for a true fix for bin/41410.
PR: bin/41410
MFC after: 1 week
CDPATH should be ignored not only for pathnames starting with '/' but also
for pathnames whose first component is '.' or '..'.
The man page already describes this behaviour.
If IFS is null, unquoted $@/$* should still expand to separate words.
This differs from quoted $@ (which does not depend on IFS) in that pathname
generation is performed and empty words are removed.
This reflects failure to determine the pathname of the new directory in the
exit status (1). Normally, cd returns successfully if it did chdir() and the
call was successful.
In POSIX, -e only has meaning with -P; because our -L is not entirely
compliant and may fall back to -P mode, -e has some effect with -L as well.
This is sometimes used with eval or old-style command substitution, and most
shells other than ash derivatives allow it.
It can also be used with scripts that violate POSIX's requirement on the
application that they end in a newline (scripts must be text files except
that line length is unlimited).
Example:
v=`cat <<EOF
foo
EOF`
echo $v
This commit does not add support for the similar construct with new-style
command substitution, like
v=$(cat <<EOF
foo
EOF)
This continues to require a newline after the terminator.
Because we have no iconv in base, support for other charsets is not
possible.
Note that \u/\U are processed using the locale that was active when the
shell started. This is necessary to avoid behaviour that depends on the
parse/execute split (for example when placing braces around an entire
script). Therefore, UTF-8 encoding is implemented manually.
?, [...] patterns match codepoints instead of bytes. They do not match
invalid sequences. [...] patterns must not contain invalid sequences
otherwise they will not match anything. This is so that ${var#?} removes the
first codepoint, not the first byte, without putting UTF-8 knowledge into
the ${var#pattern} code. However, * continues to match any string and an
invalid sequence matches an identical invalid sequence. (This differs from
fnmatch(3).)
A string between $' and ' may contain backslash escape sequences similar to
the ones in a C string constant (except that a single-quote must be escaped
and a double-quote need not be). Details are in the sh(1) man page.
This construct is useful to include unprintable characters, tabs and
newlines in strings; while this can be done with a command substitution
containing a printf command, that needs ugly workarounds if the result is to
end with a newline as command substitution removes all trailing newlines.
The construct may also be useful in future to describe unprintable
characters without needing to write those characters themselves in 'set -x',
'export -p' and the like.
The implementation attempts to comply to the proposal for the next issue of
the POSIX specification. Because this construct is not in POSIX.1-2008,
using it in scripts intended to be portable is unwise.
Matching the minimal locale support in the rest of sh, the \u and \U
sequences are currently not useful.
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
Note that this only applies to variables that are actually used.
Things like (0 && unsetvar) do not cause an error.
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
In particular, this makes things like ${#foo[0]} and ${#foo[@]} errors
rather than silent equivalents of ${#foo}.
PR: bin/151720
Submitted by: Mark Johnston
Exp-run done by: pav (with some other sh(1) changes)
For backgrounded pipelines and subshells, the previous value of $? was being
preserved, which is incorrect.
For backgrounded simple commands containing a command substitution, the
status of the last command substitution was returned instead of 0.
If fork() fails, this is an error.
If EV_EXIT causes an exit, use the exception mechanism to unwind
redirections and local variables. This way, if the final command is a
redirected command, an EXIT trap now executes without the redirections.
Because of these changes, EV_EXIT can now be inherited by the body of a
function, so do so. This means that a function no longer prevents a fork
before an exec being skipped, such as in
f() { head -1 /etc/passwd; }; echo $(f)
Wrapping a single builtin in a function may still cause an otherwise
unnecessary fork with command substitution, however.
An exit command or -e failure still invokes the EXIT trap with the
original redirections and local variables in place.
Note: this depends on SHELLPROC being gone. A SHELLPROC depended on
keeping the redirections and local variables and only cleaning up the
state to restore them.
This is only a problem if IFS contains digits, which is unusual but valid.
Because of an incorrect fix for PR bin/12137, "${#parameter}" was treated
as ${#parameter}. The underlying problem was that "${#parameter}"
erroneously added CTLESC bytes before determining the length. This
was properly fixed for PR bin/56147 but the incorrect fix was not backed
out.
Reported by: Seeker on forums.freebsd.org
MFC after: 2 weeks
These already worked: $# ${#} ${##} ${#-} ${#?}
These now work as well: ${#+word} ${#-word} ${##word} ${#%word}
There is an ambiguity in the standard with ${#?}: it could be the length of
$? or it could be $# giving an error in the (impossible) case that it is not
set. We continue to use the former interpretation as it seems more useful.
Preserving $? may cause problems particularly if set -e is in effect.
It may be useful to preserve the old value of $? in the dot script but this
must not be implemented in such a way that it would break this test.
* In {(...) <redir1;} <redir2, do not drop redir1.
* Maintain the difference between (...) <redir and {(...)} <redir:
In (...) <redir, the redirection is performed in the child, while in
{(...)} <redir it should be performed in the parent (like {(...); :;}
<redir)
POSIX requires this and it is simpler than the previous code that remembered
command locations when appending directories to PATH.
In particular,
PATH=$PATH
is no longer a no-op but discards all cached command locations.
If execve() returns an [ENOEXEC] error, check if the file is binary before
trying to execute it using sh. A file is considered binary if at least one
of the first 256 bytes is '\0'.
In particular, trying to execute ELF binaries for the wrong architecture now
fails with an "Exec format error" message instead of syntax errors and
potentially strange results.
When a foreground job exits on a signal, a message is printed to stdout
about this. The buffer was not flushed after this which could result in the
message being written to the wrong file if the next command was a builtin
and had stdout redirected.
Example:
sh -c 'kill -9 $$'; : > foo; echo FOO:; cat foo
Reported by: gcooper
MFC after: 1 week
This is useful so that it is easier to exit on a signal than to reset the
trap to default and resend the signal. It matches ksh93. POSIX says that
'exit' without args from a trap action uses the exit status from the last
command before the trap, which is different from 'exit $?' and matches this
if the previous command is assumed to have exited on the signal.
If the signal is SIGSTOP, SIGTSTP, SIGTTIN or SIGTTOU, or if the default
action for the signal is to ignore it, a normal _exit(2) is done with exit
status 128+signal_number.
