It turns out that this is useful on hornet and wasp SoCs but it isn't
enabled in ye olde HAL /unless/ you were using a version from one of the
business units building USB targetted devices. It eventually got fixed
for all of them as people started wanting to use the USB ports on their
SoCs (eg for flash storage, bluetooth, 4G/LTE widgets, etc.)
This is actually a fix from ath9k but I'm merging it with the available-but-
disabled code in the QCA reference HAL.
Tested:
* AR9331 SoC
* Firmware versions 21 and 22 generate some IWM_DEBUG_LOG_MSG notifications,
which seem to be harmless. Avoid spamming the system log with
"frame ... UNHANDLED (this should not happen)" messages.
Obtained from: dragonflybsd.git dda889ac57d8e5b46bb1b1ecf53c17a18481c7c8
* If device family is 8000 then iwm_pcie_load_cpu_sections()
won't be called at all (iwm_pcie_load_cpu_sections_8000() is
called in that case) so this piece of code never gets called.
Obtained from: dragonflybsd.git 3e9aaef308100a4d630feffc131e3aca2ae12f8a
* LAR can be disabled with the hw.iwm.lar.disable tunable now.
* On Family 8000 devices we need to check the lar_enabled flag from
nvm_data in addition to the TLV_CAPA_LAR_SUPPORT flag from the firmware.
* Add a separate IWM_DEBUG_LAR debugging flag.
Obtained from: dragonflybsd.git 0593e39cb295aa996ecf789ed4990c3b255f1770
* This change also fixes a possible issue in the existing smart-fifo code,
which set the IWM_SF_CFG_DUMMY_NOTIF_OFF bit on AC8260 chipsets, although
that's only used in iwlwifi for Family 8000 chipsets connected via SDIO
interface.
Obtained from: Dragonflybsd.git cb650b01526b0aeef3c4307d926e7f1428997d50
J. Sorenson and J. Webster, Strong pseudoprimes to twelve prime
bases, Math. Comp. 86(304):985-1003, 2017.
teach primes(6) to enumerate primes up to 2^64 - 1. Until Sorenson
and Webster's paper, we did not know how many strong speudoprime tests
were required when testing alleged primes between 3825123056546413051
and 2^64 - 1.
Reported by: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
Relnotes: primes(6) now enumerates primes beyond 3825123056546413050,
up to a new limit of 2^64 - 1.
MFC After: 1 week
Coverity warned that the switch statement fell through. While this was
intentional, the pattern wasn't especially clear. I just changed it to a
conventional if pattern.
Reported by: Coverity
CIDs: 1375851 (false positive), 1375853
Sponsored by: Dell EMC Isilon
The ICMP6 packets might not be contained in a single mbuf. So don't
assume this. Keep the IPv4 and IPv6 code in sync and make explicit
that the syncache code only need the TCP sequence number, not the
complete TCP header.
MFC after: 3 days
Sponsored by: Netflix, Inc.
Split the postive and negative parts into separate test cases. The positive
test case can only run on ZFS, because only ZFS supports files that large.
PR: 219757
Reported by: ngie
MFC after: 18 days
X-MFC-with: 319339
pmap_enter() by implementing a single return path. Otherwise, the
duplication will only increase with the upcoming support for psind == 1.
Reviewed by: kib (some time ago)
could be overridden in the SoC specific code, but this would break GENERIC
as it is likely to be incorrect.
Remove the versatile implementation of cpu_initclocks as it's unneeded.
host.
Problems start appearing when there are several threads all doing
operations on a UFS volume and the SU workqueue needs a cleanup. It is
possible that each thread calling softdep_request_cleanup() owns the
lock for some dirty vnode (e.g. all of them are executing mkdir(2),
mknod(2), creat(2) etc) and all vnodes which must be flushed are locked
by corresponding thread. Then, we get all the threads simultaneously
entering softdep_request_cleanup().
There are two problems:
- Several threads execute MNT_VNODE_FOREACH_ALL() loops in parallel. Due
to the locking, they quickly start executing 'in phase' with the speed
of the slowest thread.
- Since each thread already owns the lock for a dirty vnode, other threads
non-blocking attempt to lock the vnode owned by other thread fail,
and loops executing without making the progress.
Retry logic does not allow the situation to recover. The result is
a livelock.
Fix these problems by making the following changes:
- Allow only one thread to enter MNT_VNODE_FOREACH_ALL() loop per mp.
A new flag FLUSH_RC_ACTIVE guards the loop.
- If there were failed locking attempts during the loop, abort retry
even if there are still work items on the mp work list. An
assumption is that the items will be cleaned when other thread
either fsyncs its vnode, or unlock and allow yet another thread to
make the progress.
It is possible now that some calls would get undeserved ENOSPC from
ffs_alloc(), because the cleanup is not aggressive enough. But I do
not see how can we reliably clean up workitems if calling
softdep_request_cleanup() while still owning the vnode lock. I thought
about scheme where ffs_alloc() returns ERESTART and saves the retry
counter somewhere in struct thread, to return to the top level, unlock
the vnode and retry. But IMO the very rare (and unproven) spurious
ENOSPC is not worth the complications.
Reported and tested by: pho
Style and comments by: mckusick
Reviewed by: mckusick
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 2 weeks
Add a new sysdecode_getrusage_who() which decodes the RUSAGE_* constant
passed as the first argument to getrusage(). Use this function in both
kdump and truss to decode the first argument to getrusage().
PR: 215448
Submitted by: Anton Yuzhaninov <citrin+pr@citrin.ru>
MFC after: 1 month
the last step of ffs_unmount().
It is possible that the mount point is recorded for cleanup in AST
context while softdep flush is executed during unmount. The workitems
are flushed by other means for the unmount, but the stray reference to
struct mount blocks destruction of mount. Check for the situation and
manually call vfs_rel() before returning from ffs_unmount().
Reported and tested by: pho
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
MFC after: 1 week
This may be refined upstream.
Reviewed by: dim
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D11034
-fPIC has no effect on linking although it seems to be ignored by
GNU ld.bfd. However, it causes ld.lld to terminate with an invalid
argument error.
This is equivalent to r296057 but for the kernel (not modules) case.
MFC after: 2 months
Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
