this is more consistent with the placement of slaves in /dev/pts. The
actual name doesn't matter as it's not part of the exposed API or used by
libc. In some sense, it would be nice if these device nodes didn't have to
have names in devfs at all.
Suggested by: Stephen McKay <smckay at internode dot on dot net>
It should play nicely with the existing BSD ptys.
By default, the system will use the BSD ptys, one can set the sysctl
kern.pts.enable to 1 to make it use the new pts system.
The max number of pty that can be allocated on a system can be changed with the
sysctl kern.pts.max. It defaults to 1000, and can be increased, but it is not
recommanded, as any pty with a number > 999 won't be handled by whatever uses
utmp(5).
