Renumber cluase 4 to 3, per what everybody else did when BSD granted
them permission to remove clause 3. My insistance on keeping the same
numbering for legal reasons is too pedantic, so give up on that point.
Submitted by: Jan Schaumann <jschauma@stevens.edu>
Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/pull/96
after r298107
Summary of changes:
- Replace all instances of FILES/TESTS with ${PACKAGE}FILES. This ensures that
namespacing is kept with FILES appropriately, and that this shouldn't need
to be repeated if the namespace changes -- only the definition of PACKAGE
needs to be changed
- Allow PACKAGE to be overridden by callers instead of forcing it to always be
`tests`. In the event we get to the point where things can be split up
enough in the base system, it would make more sense to group the tests
with the blocks they're a part of, e.g. byacc with byacc-tests, etc
- Remove PACKAGE definitions where possible, i.e. where FILES wasn't used
previously.
- Remove unnecessary TESTSPACKAGE definitions; this has been elided into
bsd.tests.mk
- Remove unnecessary BINDIRs used previously with ${PACKAGE}FILES;
${PACKAGE}FILESDIR is now automatically defined in bsd.test.mk.
- Fix installation of files under data/ subdirectories in lib/libc/tests/hash
and lib/libc/tests/net/getaddrinfo
- Remove unnecessary .include <bsd.own.mk>s (some opportunistic cleanup)
Document the proposed changes in share/examples/tests/tests/... via examples
so it's clear that ${PACKAGES}FILES is the suggested way forward in terms of
replacing FILES. share/mk/bsd.README didn't seem like the appropriate method
of communicating that info.
MFC after: never probably
X-MFC with: r298107
PR: 209114
Relnotes: yes
Tested with: buildworld, installworld, checkworld; buildworld, packageworld
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division
This is rather pedantic, as for most architectures it holds that
sizeof(type *) == sizeof(type **)
Found by: clang static analyzer
Reviewed by: ed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4722
netbsd-tests.test.mk (r289151)
- Eliminate explicit OBJTOP/SRCTOP setting
- Convert all ad hoc NetBSD test integration over to netbsd-tests.test.mk
- Remove unnecessary TESTSDIR setting
- Use SRCTOP where possible for clarity
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Divison
Sort the output obtained from xargs and the expected output
to ensure the end result versus the input file is stable
Differential Revision: D3432
Submitted by: Nikolai Lifanov <lifanov@mail.lifanov.com>
Off by default, build behaves normally.
WITH_META_MODE we get auto objdir creation, the ability to
start build from anywhere in the tree.
Still need to add real targets under targets/ to build packages.
Differential Revision: D2796
Reviewed by: brooks imp
I'm starting with the easy cases. The leftovers need to be looked at a
bit more closely.
Note that this change _does_ modify the code of the old tests. This is
required in order to allow the code to locate the data files in the
source directory instead of the current directory, because Kyua
automatically changes the latter to a temporary directory.
Also note that at least one test is known to be broken here. Actually,
the test is not really broken: it's marked as a TODO but unfortunately
Kyua's TAP parser currently does not understand that. Will have to be
fixed separately.
If a utility called by xargs exits with status 255 or because of a signal,
POSIX requires writing an error message.
PR: 165155
Submitted by: Matthew Story matthewstory gmail com
is in accordance with the information provided at
ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change
Also add $FreeBSD$ to a few files to keep svn happy.
Discussed with: imp, rwatson
it to kick off a new command before the previous has finished, resulting
in corrupted (interleaved) output. It is also fooled by non-exiting
children it did not start, failing to exit until all extraneous children
have exited.
This patch makes xargs keep track of children it starts, ignoring
pre-existing ones.
but don't expect a proper ASCII string to exist right here right now, don't
use strcmp(3) which checks for a NUL. As we're still building the argument
up, the next character might be garbage. It would probably be just as safe to
temporarily write a NUL there, but if we've reached the end of argument memory
that might not be the best idea, I think. It's unclear.
Doing it this way seems to meet the most with the original intent.
PR: 85696
Prodded by: stefanf
