Because there was an extra declaration in the vendor version, we locally
removed the second one in r238405 with 1.0.1c. Later, upstream fixed it in
1.0.2d but they removed the first one. Therefore, both were removed in our
version unfortunately. Now we revert to the vendor one to re-add it.
MFC after: 3 days
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10525
Apply vendor commits:
197e0ea Fix for TLS record tampering bug. (CVE-2013-4353).
3462896 For DTLS we might need to retransmit messages from the
previous session so keep a copy of write context in DTLS
retransmission buffers instead of replacing it after
sending CCS. (CVE-2013-6450).
ca98926 When deciding whether to use TLS 1.2 PRF and record hash
algorithms use the version number in the corresponding
SSL_METHOD structure instead of the SSL structure. The
SSL structure version is sometimes inaccurate.
Note: OpenSSL 1.0.2 and later effectively do this already.
(CVE-2013-6449).
Security: CVE-2013-4353
Security: CVE-2013-6449
Security: CVE-2013-6450
Check DTLS_BAD_VER for version number.
The version check for DTLS1_VERSION was redundant as
DTLS1_VERSION > TLS1_1_VERSION, however we do need to
check for DTLS1_BAD_VER for compatibility.
Requested by: zi
Approved by: benl
Fix a bug in crypt(3) ignoring characters of a passphrase. [12:02]
Security: FreeBSD-SA-12:01.openssl (revised)
Security: FreeBSD-SA-12:02.crypt
Approved by: so (bz, simon)
cause OpenSSL to parse past the end of the message.
Note: Applications are only affected if they act as a server and call
SSL_CTX_set_tlsext_status_cb on the server's SSL_CTX. This includes
Apache httpd >= 2.3.3, if configured with "SSLUseStapling On".
Security: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20110208.txt
Security: CVE-2011-0014
Obtained from: OpenSSL CVS
It has yet to be determined if this warrants a FreeBSD Security
Advisory, but we might as well get it fixed in the normal branches.
Obtained from: OpenSSL CVS
Security: CVE-2010-2939
X-MFC after: Not long...
This fixes CVE-2010-0740 which only affected -CURRENT (OpenSSL 0.9.8m)
but not -STABLE branches.
I have not yet been able to find out if CVE-2010-0433 impacts FreeBSD.
This will be investigated further.
Security: CVE-2010-0433, CVE-2010-0740
Security: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20100324.txt
This also "reverts" some FreeBSD local changes so we should now
be back to using entirely stock OpenSSL. The local changes were
simple $FreeBSD$ lines additions, which were required in the CVS
days, and the patch for FreeBSD-SA-09:15.ssl which has been
superseded with OpenSSL 0.9.8m's RFC5746 'TLS renegotiation
extension' support.
MFC after: 3 weeks
protocol flaw. [09:15]
Correctly handle failures from unsetenv resulting from a corrupt
environment in rtld-elf. [09:16]
Fix permissions in freebsd-update in order to prevent leakage of
sensitive files. [09:17]
Approved by: so (cperciva)
Security: FreeBSD-SA-09:15.ssl
Security: FreeBSD-SA-09:16.rtld
Security: FreeBSD-SA-09:17.freebsd-udpate
- Fix memory consumption bug with "future epoch" DTLS records.
- Fix fragment handling memory leak.
- Do not access freed data structure.
- Fix DTLS fragment bug - out-of-sequence message handling which could
result in NULL pointer dereference in
dtls1_process_out_of_seq_message().
Note that this will not get FreeBSD Security Advisory as DTLS is
experimental in OpenSSL.
MFC after: 1 week
Security: CVE-2009-1377 CVE-2009-1378 CVE-2009-1379 CVE-2009-1387
long commands into multiple requests. [09:01]
Fix incorrect OpenSSL checks for malformed signatures due to invalid
check of return value from EVP_VerifyFinal(), DSA_verify, and
DSA_do_verify. [09:02]
Security: FreeBSD-SA-09:01.lukemftpd
Security: FreeBSD-SA-09:02.openssl
Obtained from: NetBSD [SA-09:01]
Obtained from: OpenSSL Project [SA-09:02]
Approved by: so (simon)
From the OpenSSL advisory:
Andy Polyakov discovered a flaw in OpenSSL's DTLS
implementation which could lead to the compromise of clients
and servers with DTLS enabled.
DTLS is a datagram variant of TLS specified in RFC 4347 first
supported in OpenSSL version 0.9.8. Note that the
vulnerabilities do not affect SSL and TLS so only clients and
servers explicitly using DTLS are affected.
We believe this flaw will permit remote code execution.
Security: CVE-2007-4995
Security: http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20071012.txt
