eab153cc9d
my tests, it is faster ~20%, even on an old IXP425 533MHz it is ~45% faster... This is partly due to loop unrolling, so the code size does significantly increase... I do plan on committing a version that rolls up the loops again for smaller code size for embedded systems where size is more important than absolute performance (it'll save ~6k code)... The kernel implementation is now shared w/ userland's libcrypt and libmd... We drop support for sha256 from sha2.c, so now sha2.c only contains sha384 and sha512... Reviewed by: secteam@ |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
sha2.c | ||
sha2.h | ||
sha256.h | ||
sha256c.c |