3b383c9ede
The code compiles fine under Clang, but GCC on PPC is less permissive about integer and pointer sizes. (An intmax_t is clearly *large enough* to hold a pointer value.) Another follow-up to r290475. Reported by: jhibbits Sponsored by: EMC / Isilon Storage Division |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
cloudabi | ||
cloudabi64 | ||
freebsd32 | ||
ia32 | ||
linprocfs | ||
linsysfs | ||
linux | ||
linuxkpi/common | ||
ndis | ||
netbsd | ||
svr4 | ||
x86bios |