6ea8f09ae9
help; also point them in the direction of the source, not PHK (or any other human) if they need to make CTM deltas of their own.
86 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
86 lines
3.7 KiB
Plaintext
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# "THE BEER-WARE LICENSE" (Revision 42):
|
|
# <phk@login.dknet.dk> wrote this file. As long as you retain this notice you
|
|
# can do whatever you want with this stuff. If we meet some day, and you think
|
|
# this stuff is worth it, you can buy me a beer in return. Poul-Henning Kamp
|
|
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
#
|
|
# $FreeBSD$
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
What will I not find in this file ?
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
Instructions on how to obtain FreeBSD via CTM.
|
|
Contact <CTM@FreeBSD.org> for that.
|
|
|
|
What is CTM ?
|
|
-------------
|
|
CTM was originally "CVS Through eMail", but has since changed scope to be
|
|
much more general.
|
|
CTM is now meant to be the definitive way to make and apply a delta between
|
|
two versions of a directory tree.
|
|
There are two parts to this, making the delta and applying it. These are two
|
|
entirely different things. CTM concentrates the computation-burden on the
|
|
generation of the deltas, as a delta very often is applied more times than
|
|
it is made. Second CTM tries to make the minimal size delta.
|
|
|
|
Why not use diff/patch ?
|
|
------------------------
|
|
Good question. Primarily because diff and patch doesn't do their job very
|
|
well. They don't deal with binary files (in this case files with '\0' or
|
|
'\0377' characters in them or files that doesn't end in '\n') which isn't
|
|
a big surprise: they were made to deal with text-files only. As a second
|
|
gripe, with patch you send the entire file to delete it. Not particular
|
|
efficient.
|
|
|
|
So what does CTM do exactly ?
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
CTM will produce a file, (a delta) containing the instructions and data needed
|
|
to take another copy of the tree from the old to the new status. CTM means to
|
|
do this in the exact sense, and therefore the delta contains MD5 checksums to
|
|
verify that the tree it is applied to is indeed in the state CTM expects.
|
|
|
|
This means that if you have modified the tree locally, CTM might not be able
|
|
to upgrade your copy.
|
|
|
|
How do I make a CTM-delta ?
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Read the source, and be prepared to have 2 copies of the tree; One is
|
|
the reference ("From") tree, and the other is the delta ("To") tree.
|
|
The mkCTM script will create the CTM diff of the differences between
|
|
the reference tree and the delta tree. A lot of scratch space is
|
|
required, and your machine will work hard.
|
|
|
|
How do I apply a CTM-delta ?
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
You pass it to the 'ctm' command. You can pass a CTM-delta on stdin, or
|
|
you can give the filename as an argument. If you do the latter, you make
|
|
life a lot easier for your self, since the program can accept gzip'ed files
|
|
and since it will not have to make a temporary copy of your file. You can
|
|
specify multiple deltas at one time, they will be processed one at a time.
|
|
|
|
The ctm command runs in a number of passes. It will process the entire
|
|
input file in each pass, before commencing with the next pass.
|
|
|
|
Pass 1 will validate that the input file is OK. The syntax, the data and
|
|
the global MD5 checksum will be checked. If any of these fail, ctm will
|
|
never be able to do anything with the file, so it will simply reject it.
|
|
|
|
Pass 2 will validate that the directory tree is in the state expected by
|
|
the CTM-delta. This is done by looking for files and directories which
|
|
should/should not exists and by checking the MD5 checksums of files.
|
|
|
|
Pass 3 will actually apply the delta.
|
|
|
|
Should I delete the delta when I have applied it ?
|
|
--------------------------------------------------
|
|
No. You might want to selectively reconstruct a file latter on.
|
|
|
|
Why is CTM not being maintained?
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
Because CVSUP has improved on the concept quite a bit, and is now
|
|
the method of choice.
|
|
|
|
Poul-Henning
|